Trending Topic

4 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Welcome to this issue of touchREVIEWS in Neurology, where we explore significant advances in neurology, cognitive health, and wearable technology in the management of various chronic conditions. This issue brings together a collection of expert perspectives and research that spans innovative therapies, preventive strategies, and case studies, each offering critical insights for clinicians and researchers. […]

Constructive Interference in Steady State Imaging in the Central Nervous System

Fabrício Guimarães Gonçalves, Lázaro Luis Faria do Amaral
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Jul 15th 2011 European Neurological Review, 2011;6(2):138-142 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/ENR.2011.06.02.138
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Constructive interference in steady state (CISS) is a fully refocused fast-gradient echo sequence that is mainly used in the assessment of the central nervous system. The most important advantages of steady-state imaging are short acquisition times, high signal-to-noise ratio, and better contrast-to-noise ratio. Owing to its cisternographic effect, CISS is useful in the assessment of the cranial nerves, and can also be used when studying cysts, cystic masses, and neurocysticercosis and in hydrocephalus cases. CISS has been shown to be useful in spinal imaging, epecially in cases of arteriovenous malformation and when it is helpful to better characterise intra- and extramedullary cystic abnormalities.

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to make a special acknowledgment to Dr Michael McInnis for reviewing the material and for useful suggestions.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging, fast-gradient echo sequence, steady-state imaging, constructive interference in steady state, longitudinal magnetisation, transverse magnetisation, central nervous system, cranial nerves, neurocysticercosis, spine

2

Article

What Is Constructive Interference in Steady State Imaging?

What Is Constructive Interference in Steady State Imaging?

Constructive interference in steady state (CISS) imaging is a member of the family of fast gradient echo (GRE) sequences. The CISS sequence is particularly dependent on high gradient amplitude and slew rates.1 To run this type of sequence, high-gradient-strength magnets are required to reach the peak of the gradient as rapidly as possible. CISS has different names according to different manufacturers: it is called fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) by General Electric, true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) by Siemens, balanced fast field echo (FFE) by Philips, and true steady-state free precession (SSFP) by Toshiba. CISS is mainly used in the assessment of the central nervous system, but it is also used when imaging the abdomen, the musculoskeletal system and the breast. The last three areas are not within the scope of this article.

How Are Constructive Interference in Steady State Images Acquired?

When inside a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, the randomly moving protons in the patient’s body align along the longitudinal z-axis. The z-axis is a magnetisation vector parallel to both the long axis of the patient’s body and the bore of the scanner. This magnetisation force, represented as a vector along the positive side of the z-axis, is called longitudinal magnetisation (LM). When a radiofrequency pulse (RFP) is applied, the magnetisation vector is tipped to the transverse plane. This tipped magnetisation vector has two components: the LM, which recovers, and the transverse magnetisation (TM), which decays during each repetition time (TR) period in the x-axis.
CISS is a ‘green’ sequence. The main recycling idea is not to waste the signal from the decaying TM in every RFP, because it is this signal that provides the T2 properties of a given tissue. Instead of being lost, the TM is reinforced into the transverse plane. The TM is recovered by applying an 180° phase shift during each TR period, after which the TM shifts in the transverse plane. The following RFP simultaneously tips a component of the residual TM back along the z-axis and a portion of the LM into the transverse plane (x-axis). After multiple TR periods have elapsed, this feeding of the LM into the TM, and vice versa, eventually establishes an equilibrium state of both the LM and the TM.
It must be stressed that it is necessary to keep the TR shorter than the T2 relaxation time of the tissue; in this way there is insufficient time for the TM to decay completely before the next RFP excitation. To achieve CISS images, residual TM is always necessary. Once the equilibrium is reached, two types of signal are produced: the first is a post-excitation signal, which consists of free induction decay arising from the most recent RFP, and the second is the echo reformation prior to excitation, when residual echo is refocused at the time of the subsequent RFP.
There are three main types of fast GRE sequence: spoiled, partially refocused and fully refocused. When the pre- and post-excitation signals are lost and wasted, the resulting image is T1-weighted. When only the post-excitation signal is acquired, the images obtained are very sensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneities, with a resulting T2* (star) effect. A very similar image to CISS can be obtained by acquiring the pre-excitation signal only. This sequence has a relatively long echo time (TE) and therefore suffers from more flow artifacts and a lower signal-to-noise ratio. CISS is a fully refocused fast GRE sequence in which both pre- and post-excitation signals are sampled, with the subsequent advantage of having a high signal-to-noise ratio and high spatial resolution.1

Advantages of Constructive Interference in Steady State Imaging

One of the most important advantages of steady-state imaging is the short acquisition time thanks to the short TR and TE. With short TR and TE, tissues with long T2 relaxation will demonstrate wider range and additional signals owing to various refocused echo paths. Other advantages are the high signal-to-noise ratio and better contrast-to-noise ratio. Additionally, CISS images do not present significant susceptibility-, motion-, or flow-related artifacts.2

Uses of Constructive Interference in Steady State

CISS is widely used to assess the cranial nerves (CNs). The CNs were first studied by CISS at the beginning of the 1990s, and the first CNs studied were the facial (CNVII) and vestibulocochlear (CNVIII) nerves.3 Owing to its cisternographic effect, CISS provides finely detailed images of the CNS, especially of their cisternal and canalicular portions (see Figures 1 and 2).
In cases of pulsatile tinnitus or facial spasms, CISS plays a major role in the assessment of vascular loops compressing the nerves in the cerebellopontine angle cistern (CPA) or inside the internal auditory canal (IAC) (see Figure 3).4 This sequence is also useful to study masses in the CPA cistern, especially in cases of hearing impairment.5

The Cranial Nerves
The Olfactory and Optic Nerves

CISS can be used in the evaluation of the olfactory nerve (CNI). It provides better results than 2D turbo spin echo, although not significantly better in comparison with ultrafast spoiled gradient echo 3D imaging (multiplanar gradient-recalled [MPGR]/magnetisation-prepared rapid acquisition gradiant echo [MPRAGE]).6 CISS provides similar results to MPRAGE in the assessment of the optic nerve (CNII), although MPRAGE is superior to CISS for studying the optic chiasm and tract.7

The Oculomotor Nerve

The oculomotor nerve (CNIII) is readily seen from the interpeduncular fossa to the cavernous sinuses (see Figure 4).8 The CNIII runs between the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) and the superior cerebellar artery (SCA) and innervates the extraocular muscles, including the elevator muscle of the upper eyelid, except for the superior oblique and the lateral rectus muscles. CISS can potentially be used to rule out aneurysms arising from the posterior circulation or from the posterior communicating artery that impinge on the CNIII.9

The Trochlear Nerve

The trochlear nerve (CNIV) is the longest intracranial nerve, although it is the smallest in terms of number of axons. It originates in the dorsal aspect of the midbrain and innervates the superior oblique muscle. It runs posteriorly and inferiorly around the Sylvian aqueduct and decussates at the level of the superior medullary velum. CNIV exists beneath the inferior colliculus, opposite its nucleus of origin. The cisternal segment of the CNIV parallels the courses of the SCA, the PCA, and the basal vein of Rosenthal, passing between the PCA and the SCA, piercing the dura and reaching the cavernous sinus. CISS allows accurate identification of the cisternal segment of the CNIV and its neurovascular relationships in the vast majority of cases.10

The Trigeminal Nerve

The trigeminal nerve (CNV) is the largest CN in terms of number of axons. It is mainly a sensory nerve of the face and has three main divisions. The first (V1) and second (V2) divisions (ophthalmic and maxillary) are purely sensory, while the third (V3) (mandibular) carries both sensory and motor fibers. The motor component of V3 is responsible for muscle mastication, the tensor tympani, the tensor veli palatini, the mylohyoid, and the anterior belly of the digastric muscle. In Meckel’s cave the three branches converge, with the cell bodies of incoming sensory nerve fibers located in a ganglion (the Gasserian or semilunar ganglion). The main roots of CNV and the Gasserian ganglion can be finely depicted by CISS in the prepontine cistern (see Figure 5) and in Meckel’s cave, respectively.11 In cases of trigeminal neuralgia, CISS plays an important role in searching for vascular compressions.12

The Abducens Nerve

The abducens nerve (CNVI) innervates the lateral rectus muscle. It leaves the brainstem at the pontomedullary junction, then courses superiorly through the prepontine cistern and bends anteriorly to enter the Dorello’s canal at the tip of the petrous apex. It is the only CN that is truly inside the cavernous sinus. The course of the abducens nerve and its relationship to the adjacent vessels can be reliably identified using CISS in the vast majority of cases (see Figure 6).13

The Lower Cranial Nerve Complex

The glossopharyngeal nerve (CNIX), the vagus nerve (CNX), and the cranial component of the spinal accessory nerve (CNXI) form the lower cranial nerve complex (LCNC). The nuclei of the LCNC are located in the medulla oblongata. These nerves arise from the medulla oblongata in the post-olivary sulcus as small rootlets in a linear array.14

The Glossopharyngeal Nerve

CNIX has both a cranial component and a spinal root, with a very complex physiology and numerous functions. It originates from the anterior and lateral portion of the medulla in the groove between the inferior olivary nucleus (ION) and the restiform body. It carries sensory information from the posterior third of the tongue, tonsils, pharynx and middle ear and supplies parasympathetic stimuli to the parotid gland. Additionally, it receives sensory fibers from the carotid bodies and supplies motor fibers to the stylopharyngeus muscle. CNIX passes anterior to the choroid plexus and cerebellar flocculus. It is the only nerve that enters the jugular foramen through the pars nervosa, which is a funnel-shaped dural meatus medial to the jugular spur (see Figure 7). The inferior petrosal sinus can be used as a landmark to identify CNIX, which is anterior to the glossopharyngeal meatus.14

The Vagus Nerve

CNX is the longest cranial nerve. It innervates the larynx, oesophagus, heart, lung, stomach, and intestines. On leaving the medulla between the ION and the inferior cerebellar peduncle, it extends through the pars vascularis of the jugular foramen, then passes into the carotid sheath to lie between the internal carotid artery and the internal jugular vein. The great majority of fibers composing CNX are afferent (sensory), conveying information from the viscera to the central nervous system. It supplies all of the intra-abdominal organs, with the exception of the adrenal glands and the distal second segment of the transverse colon. CNX is seen in its cisternal portion before entering the jugular foramen as one or two main roots (see Figure 8) at the level of the vagal trigone (a small bulge in the caudal portion of the floor of the fourth ventricle caused by the dorsal motor nucleus of CNX).14

The Spinal Accessory Nerve

CNXI has both a cranial and a spinal component. CNXI is purely motor, innervating the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. CNXI is not easily visualised, and in some situations coronal oblique reformats are necessary. However, root bundles that enter the pars vascularis but do not join the one or two main vagal roots can be classified as CNXI. The spinal roots of CNXI are those that rise through the foramen magnum and traverse the posterior fossa to reach the pars vascularis.14

The Hypoglossal Nerve

The hypoglossal nerve (CNXII) is a pure motor nerve that innervates the intrinsic and extrinsic tongue muscles (see Figure 9). The nucleus of CNXII is located medially to the dorsal nucleus of CNX and lies within the posterior and inferior aspects of the medulla oblongata. It lies close to the midline in the floor of the fourth ventricle, causing a focal bulge. CNXII exits the brainstem between the ION and the pyramid in the pre-olivary sulcus. The vertebral and posterior inferior cerebellar arteries are anterior and posterior to the cisternal portion of the CNXII, respectively.15

Cysts and Cystic Lesions

CISS is the sequence of choice to study cystic structures. Its application ranges broadly from the assessment of Virchow–Robin spaces (VRS) to the evaluation of cystic tumours such as dysembryoplastic neuroepithial tumours (DNET).

Virchow–Robin Spaces

VRS are an extension of the subarachnoid space that surround the walls of arteries, arterioles, veins, and venules. The VRS signal should always follow that of the cerebrospinal fluid in all pulse sequences and should not enhance. Typically, VRS can occur in three locations: along the lenticulostriate arteries, inferior to the basal ganglia at the level of the anterior perforated substance (type 1); in the path of the perforating medullary arteries in the convexities, extending into the white matter (type 2) and in the midbrain (type 3) surrounding the collicular, accessory collicular, and thalamoperforating arteries, in the pontomesencephalic junction, and between the cerebral peduncles (see Figure 10).16
VRS are typically seen as well-defined oval, rounded, or tubular structures, depending on the plane in which they are imaged. They have regular margins, are commonly bilateral, and may be called enlarged when they measure more than 2 mm.17 They can be atypical, presenting in clusters, or markedly large, causing mass effects, with odd shapes. They can even be misinterpreted as other pathologic processes, most often a cystic neoplasm. Although benign in some situations, dilated VRS can present with hydrocephalus due to compression of the cerebral aqueduct.16

The Vestibular System

CISS can play an important role in cases of sensorial hearing loss and also to study the vestibular system. It delivers fine detail when imaging the semi-circular canals and otolith organs (see Figure 11).17

Neurocysticercosis

CISS is extremely useful for evaluating patients with neurocysticercosis (NCC), especially if the cestode is located in the ventricular system or subarachnoid space. CISS is the best single modality to depict the scolex inside the cysticercus cyst, particularly in the first stage of the disease when the cysticercus is antigenically non-viable and neither enhancement nor oedema is noted (see Figure 12).
In the second and third stages of NCC, the scolex may or may not be identified. In the fourth (involutional) stage, CISS is not adequate and other MRI sequences are more suitable for characterising the calcifying cystercus.18

Hydrocephalus

CISS is useful in patients with hydrocephalus. It is an excellent tool for assessing the cerebral aqueduct because it is capable of demonstrating minute membranes that may be seen in cases of non-communicating hydrocephalus.19

The Spine

The use of CISS for spinal abnormalities is a more recent development. This sequence can be useful for characterising both intra- and extramedullary cystic abnormalities.20 CISS can also be used to study the architecture of arteriovenous fistulas.21

Conclusion

In summary, CISS imaging is useful in the study of CNs, most notably when vascular compression tumours are suspected. CISS may also be of particular use in sensorineural hearing loss, for characterising the content of a cystic mass, and in cases of NCC. More recently, CISS has proved to be beneficial in spine imaging, especially in cases of intraspinal cystic lesions and arteriovenous malformations. ■

2

References

  1. Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Jankharia BG, et al., Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications, Radiographics, 2008;28:1147–60.
  2. Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S, Principles and applications of balanced SSFP technique, Eur Radiol, 2003;13:2409–18.
  3. Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deimling M, et al., Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1993;14:47–57.
  4. Girard N, Poncet M, Caces F, et al., Three-dimensional MRI of hemifacial spasm with surgical correlation, Neuroradiology, 1997;39:46–51.
  5. Hermans R, Van der Goten A, De Foer B, Baert AL, MRI screening for acoustic neuroma without gadolinium: value of 3DFT-CISS sequence, Neuroradiology, 1997;39:593–8.
  6. Held P, Seitz J, Fründ R, et al., MRI detection of olfactory bulb and tract, J Neuroradiol, 2000;27:112–8.
  7. Held P, Nitz W, Seitz J, et al., Comparison of 2D and 3D MRI of the optic and oculomotor nerve anatomy, Clin Imaging, 2000;24:337–43.
  8. Liang C, Du Y, Lin X, et al., Anatomical features of the cisternal segment of the oculomotor nerve: neurovascular relationships and abnormal compression on magnetic resonance imaging, Neurosurg, 2009;111:1193–200.
  9. Satoh T, Omi M, Ohsako C, et al., Visualization of aneurysmal contours and perianeurysmal environment with conventional and transparent 3D MR cisternography, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005;26:313–8.
  10. Yousry I, Moriggl B, Dieterich M, et al., MR anatomy of the proximal cisternal segment of the trochlear nerve: neurovascular relationships and landmarks, Radiology, 2002;223:31–8.
  11. Yousry I, Moriggl B, Schmid UD, et al., Trigeminal ganglion and its divisions: detailed anatomic MR imaging with contrast-enhanced 3D constructive interference in the steady state sequences, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005;26:1128–35.
  12. Yoshino N, Akimoto H, Yamada I, et al., Trigeminal neuralgia: evaluation of neuralgic manifestation and site of neurovascular compression with 3D CISS MR imaging and MR angiography, Radiology, 2003;228:539–45.
  13. Yousry I, Camelio S, Wiesmann M, et al., Detailed magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the cisternal segment of the abducent nerve: Dorello’s canal and neurovascular relationships and landmarks, J Neurosurg, 1999;91:276–83.
  14. Linn J, Moriggl B, Schwarz F, et al., Cisternal segments of the glossopharyngeal, vagus, and accessory nerves: detailed magnetic resonance imaging-demonstrated anatomy and neurovascular relationships, J Neurosurg, 2009;110:1026–41.
  15. Yousry I, Moriggl B, Schmid UD, et al., Detailed anatomy of the intracranial segment of the hypoglossal nerve: neurovascular relationships and landmarks on magnetic resonance imaging sequences, J Neurosurg, 2002;96:1113–22.
  16. Kwee RM, Kwee TC, Virchow-Robin spaces at MR imaging, Radiographics, 2007;27:1071–86.
  17. Liang C, Zhang B, Wu L, et al., The superiority of 3D-CISS sequence in displaying the cisternal segment of facial, vestibulocochlear nerves and their abnormal changes, Eur J Radiol, 2010;74(3):437–40.
  18. do Amaral LL, Ferreira RM, da Rocha AJ, Ferreira NP, Neurocysticercosis: evaluation with advanced magnetic resonance techniques and atypical forms, Top Magn Reson Imaging, 2005;16:127–44.
  19. Kurihara N, Takahashi S, Tamura H, et al., Investigation of hydrocephalus with three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state MRI, Neuroradiology, 2000;42:634–8.
  20. Gonçalves FG, Neves PO, Jovem CL, et al., Chronic myelopathy associated to intramedullary cysticercosis, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010;35:E159–62.
  21. Ramli N, Cooper A, Jaspan T, High resolution CISS imaging of the spine, Br J Radiol, 2001;74:862–73.
3

Article Information

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Fabrício Guimarães Gonçalves, Diagnostic Radiology, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Room D5 137, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1A4. E: goncalves.neuroradio@gmail.com

Received

2010-07-08T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup