Trending Topic

3D illustration of human brain on black background
23 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Joseph Samaha, Jim Dagher, Shayan Abdollah Zadegan

Huntington’s disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disease inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. It is caused by an expansion of cytosine, adenine, guanine (CAG) repeats within the huntingtin (HTT) gene, which is located on chromosome 4. This pathological expansion of CAG repeats results in the production of a mutant huntingtin protein with an abnormally long polyglutamine […]

Clinical Differential Diagnosis of Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Jean-Marc Léger, Eugen Gavriliuc
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: May 15th 2012 European Neurological Review, 2012;7(2):124–7 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/ENR.2012.07.02.124
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare, clinically well-defined condition within the spectrum of chronic, immune-mediated neuropathies. A typical patient history involves slowly or stepwise progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and muscle wasting, most frequently in the arm, that may have developed over a period of years. As a rare condition, MMN may present a diagnostic challenge for non-specialists and some patients may wait years for a correct diagnosis. Timely and accurate diagnosis is essential for patients with MMN. Unlike some motor neuropathies, MMN is treatable with intravenous immunoglobulin and untreated patients are likely to experience progressive muscle weakness that may result in serious functional impairment and impaired quality of life. The aim of this article is therefore to provide a guide for non-specialist neurologists to the clinical recognition and differential diagnosis of MMN.

Keywords

Multifocal motor neuropathy, diagnosis, symptoms, signs

2

Article

The term multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) was first introduced over 20 years ago1 and it is now recognised as a clinically well-defined condition within the spectrum of chronic, immune-mediated neuropathies.2–4 MMN is a rare disease, with an estimated prevalence of no more than one or two per 100,000.5 However, results from French and Dutch studies suggest that MMN is under-diagnosed and that it can take several years for patients to achieve an accurate diagnosis after they first present.6

Accurate and timely recognition of MMN is important because it is a treatable disorder. In randomised studies, immunomodulatorytreatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) results in a significant improvement in patient functioning and muscle strength7–10 and the drug is now recognised as the gold-standard treatment of MMN.11 If left untreated, MMN results in progressive muscle weakness that for some patients ultimately results in serious functionalimpairment.12 Delayed diagnosis may also have implications for patients’ response to IVIg, since early initiation of treatment may help to postpone axonal degeneration and permanent deficits.6,13

MMN is under-recognised because it is a rare disease and non-specialists report difficulty in its clinical and electrophysiological diagnosis.14 As a result, the disorder may be confused with other presentations, some of which are life threatening and do not respond to immunomodulatory treatment. Since physicians report that increased dissemination of diagnostic criteria would raise awareness of the possibility of MMN,14 the aim of this article is to provide a guide for non-specialist neurologists to the recognition and differential diagnosis of MMN.

Clinical Signs and Symptoms
MMN is a purely motor deficit that affects individual nerves. It predominantly occurs in younger people, with a median age of onset of 40 years.6 The disorder is more frequently seen in men than in women in a ratio of 2.7:1, and age of onset is usually younger in men.6

A typical patient history involves slowly or stepwise progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and muscle wasting that may have developed over a period of years. In a study of 88 Dutch patients with confirmed MMN, onset of muscle weakness occurred most frequently in the distal arm – most often in the dominant hand – or rarely the distal leg.6 Symptoms follow a relapsing course and worsen with exposure to cold. Muscle atrophy is mild in early MMN15 but may develop with longer duration of disease.16,17 Patients may describe loss of strength in the affected limb, within an anatomical distribution of individual motor nerves, so that they have difficulty in gripping objects and experience muscle cramps, involuntary muscle contractions and fatigue. The degree of disability generally correlates with the duration of the disease.6

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Pestronk A, Cornblath DR, Ilyas AA, et al., A treatable
    multifocal motor neuropathy with antibodies to GM1
    ganglioside, Ann Neurol, 1988;24:73–8.

  2. Chad DA, Hammer K, Sargent J, Slow resolution of
    multifocal weakness and fasciculation: a reversible
    motor neuron syndrome, Neurology, 1986;36:1260–3.

  3. Parry GJ, Clarke S, Multifocal acquired demyelinating
    neuropathy masquerading as motor neuron disease,
    Muscle Nerve, 1988;11:103–7.

  4. Roth G, Rohr J, Magistris MR, et al., Motor neuropathy
    with proximal multifocal persistent conduction block,
    fasciculations and myokymia. Evolution to tetraplegia,
    Eur Neurol, 1986;25:416–23.

  5. Nobile-Orazio E, Cappellari A, Priori A, Multifocal motor
    neuropathy: current concepts and controversies,
    Muscle Nerve, 2005;31:663–80.

  6. Cats EA, van der Pol WL, Piepers S, et al., Correlates of
    outcome and response to IVIg in 88 patients with multifocal
    motor neuropathy, Neurology, 2010;75:818–25.

  7. Azulay JP, Blin O, Pouget J, et al., Intravenous
    immunoglobulin treatment in patients with motor neuron
    syndromes associated with anti-GM1 antibodies: a doubleblind,
    placebo-controlled study, Neurology, 1994;44:429–32.

  8. Federico P, Zochodne DW, Hahn AF, et al., Multifocal motor
    neuropathy improved by IVIg: randomized, double-blind,
    placebo-controlled study, Neurology, 2000;55:1256–62.

  9. Léger JM, Chassande B, Musset L, et al., Intravenous
    immunoglobulin therapy in multifocal motor neuropathy: a
    double-blind, placebo-controlled study, Brain, 2001;124:145–53.

  10. Van den Berg LH, Kerkhoff H, Oey PL, et al., Treatment of
    multifocal motor neuropathy with high dose intravenous
    immunoglobulins: a double blind, placebo controlled study,
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1995;59:248–52.

  11. Léger JM, Vargas S, Lievens I, Efficacy of intravenous
    immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy,
    Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2007;1110:248–55.

  12. Lange DJ, Weimer LH, Trojaborg W, et al., Multifocal motor
    neuropathy with conduction block. Slow but not benign,
    Arch Neurol, 2006;63:1778–81.

  13. Van Asseldonk JTH, Van den Berg LH, Kalmijn S, et al., Axon
    loss is an important determinant of weakness in multifocal
    motor neuropathy, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2006;77:743–7.

  14. Léger JM, Beaudet R, Bonnélye G, [Treatment of multifocal
    motor neuropathies with conduction block in France
    in 2005. Results of a national opinion survey],
    Rev Neurol (Paris), 2006;162:3S27–3S45. French.

  15. Slee M, Selvan A, Donaghy M, Multifocal motor neuropathy:
    the diagnostic spectrum and response to treatment,
    Neurology, 2007;69:1680–7.

  16. Nobile-Orazio E, Meucci N, Barbieri S, et al., High-dose
    intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in multifocal motor
    neuropathy, Neurology, 1993;43:537–44.

  17. Bouche P, Moulonguet A, Younes-Chennoufi AB, et al.,
    Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block: a study
    of 24 patients, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1995;59:38–44.

  18. Joint Task Force of the EFNS and PNS, European Federation
    of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline
    on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of
    a Joint Task Force of the European Federation of
    Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve
    Society—first revision, J Periph Nerve Syst, 2010;15:295–301.

  19. Van Asseldonk JTH, Van den Berg LH, Van den Berg-Vos RM,
    et al., Demyelination and axon loss in multifocal motor
    neuropathy: distribution and relation to weakness,
    Brain, 2003;126:186–98.

  20. Delmont E, Azulay JP, Giorgi R, et al., Multifocal motor
    neuropathy with and without conduction block: a
    single entity?, Neurology, 2006;67:592–6.

  21. Nodera H, Bostock H, Izumi Y, et al., Activity-dependent
    conduction block in multifocal motor neuropathy:
    magnetic fatigue test, Neurology, 2006;67:280–7.

  22. Van Schaik IN, Bossuyt PM, Brand A, et al., Diagnostic
    value of GM1 antibodies in motor neuron disorders and
    neuropathies: a meta-analysis, Neurology, 1995;45:1570–7.

  23. Willison HJ, Yuki N, Peripheral neuropathies and
    anti-glycolipid antibodies, Brain, 2002;125:2591–625.

  24. Van den Berg-Vos RM, Franssen H, Wokke JH, et al.,
    Multifocal motor neuropathy: diagnostic criteria that
    predict the response to immunoglobulin treatment,
    Ann Neurol, 2000;48:919–26.

  25. Van Es HW, Van den Berg LH, Franssen H, et al., Magnetic
    resonance imaging of the brachial plexus in patients
    with multifocal motor neuropathy, Neurology,
    1997;48:1218–24.

  26. Van den Berg LH, Lokhorst H, Wokke JHJ, Pulsed high-dose
    dexamethasone is not effect in patients with multifocal
    motor neuropathy, Neurology, 1997;48:1135.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

Jean-Marc Léger was the chief investigator of a trial published in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) with Endobulin® and of a retrospective study in MMN with Tégéline®. Eugem Gavriliuc has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Jean-Marc Léger, Centre National de Réference Maladies Neuromusculaires Rares, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière and University Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI), 47 boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France. E: jean-marc.leger@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr

Support

ticle was funded by Baxter Innovations GmbH. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Baxter Innovations GmbH.

Received

2012-03-05T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup