Trending Topic

Brain head human mental idea mind 3D illustration background
8 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Cognitive impairment is the hallmark symptom of Alzheimer’s disease (AD); however, neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), including psychosis, agitation and mood disturbances, are common not only in AD but also in Parkinson’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia and vascular dementia.1–5 Psychotic symptoms have been reported to be present in 12–74% of patients with AD, with […]

Pridopidine: Topline Results from the Phase III Trial, PROOF-HD, for the Treatment of Huntington’s Disease

Ralf Reilmann
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: Aug 9th 2023 touchREVIEWS in Neurology. 2023;19(2):4-6 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/USN.2023.19.2.3
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Dr Ralf Reilmann is the Founding Director and CEO of the George-Huntington-Institute (www.ghimuenster.de) in Muenster, Germany, where he and his team of neurologists, researchers and coordinators follow one of the largest groups of Huntington’s disease (HD) families globally. Dr Reilmann served on several HD-related bodies, e.g. the Executive Committees of both the Huntington Study Group and the European Huntington Disease Network. His main interest is the conduct of clinical trials in HD, several of which he leads as the global coordinating principle investigator, including the first gene therapy trials for HD. HD-GeneTRX-1 and -2 are currently active in North America and Europe. He is specifically committed to the advancement of objective endpoints for clinical trials and developed the “Q-Motor” system, which is meanwhile widely applied in multiple global clinical trials in HD and beyond. He holds appointments at the Section for Neurodegenerative Diseases at the Department of Neurology & the Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research at the University of Tuebingen and Institute of Clinical Radiology at the University of Muenster. He trained at the University of Münster (Münster, Germany) and Columbia University (New York, NY, USA), and studied as a scholar of the “Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes” (German Academic Scholarship Foundation) in Muenster, Paris, London and New York.

Keywords
2

Article

Huntington’s disease (HD) is a genetic neurodegenerative disease that can affect movement, cognition and mental health. It is caused by a dominant mutation in the huntingtin gene, HTT. HD is estimated to occur in 5–10 people per 100,000 yearly, worldwide.1 Pridopidine (Prilenia Neurotherapeutics Ltd, Greenwork Park, Kibbutz Yakum, 6097200, Israel), a sigma-1 receptor (S1R) agonist, is currently under investigation in the phase III clinical trial PROOF-HD (Pridopidine’s Outcome On Function in Huntington Disease; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04556656) to determine whether it can improve HD in adults.2 The first results of this study were presented at the 2023 American Academy of Neurology meeting.3,4 In this expert interview, Dr Ralf Reilmann discusses the trial outcomes, drawing comparisons to current treatment options. He addresses why the primary endpoint was missed and outlines the potential avenues for future research and development.

Q. Can you provide an overview of the unmet needs in the treatment of Huntington’s disease and the current treatment options?

Current treatment options are limited and solely symptomatic.5 The involuntary choratic movements can be reduced by dopamine-depleting agents or neuroleptics. Depression and anxiety can be improved by certain antidepressants, and agitation can be improved with neuroleptics. However, all of these treatments have relevant side effects. Most importantly, no available treatment can halt or slow the progression of HD. Pridopidine offers a novel mechanism of action for HD by acting as an agonist of the S1R. S1R agonists were shown to modify processes relevant to the pathology of HD and improve symptoms, histopathology and lifespan in preclinical HD models.6,7 The activity of pridopidine on S1R has been shown in human positron emission tomography studies.8 Indeed, pridopidine has shown positive effects in secondary endpoints in several human clinical trials. For example, the phase II study PRIDE-HD (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02006472) showed positive results in the objective Q-Motor assessment and the total functional capacity (TFC) score of the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS), especially in patients with early-stage HD.9

Q. What are the aims, design and eligibility criteria of the PROOF-HD study?

PROOF-HD was designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of pridopidine 45 mg twice daily (BID) compared with placebo on global functionally relevant domains in HD. It included early symptomatic subjects with proven HD mutation and preserved function. The primary endpoint was the TFC score of the UHDRS. Several secondary endpoints were included: the composite Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (cUHDRS), which assesses multiple relevant domains, such as motion, cognition and function; the objective Q-Motor assessment; and scales for specific relevant subdomains, such as cognition.

Q. What were the key findings from the study? Could you elaborate on the specific benefits observed in certain patient subgroups?

The high need for novel treatment options in HD was demonstrated by the dynamic recruitment of participants for the PROOF-HD study, which was completed ahead of schedule. The study was conducted by the clinical research organization Huntington Study Group Clinical Research for the sponsor Prilenia. The global network of the Huntington Study Group Clinical Research facilitated the recruitment and execution of the study. The primary endpoint failed to show significant effects in the overall study population; however, we did see nominally significant effects in some Q-Motor measures, which corroborated findings from the PRIDE-HD study. Notably, prespecified analyses of participants who were not taking neuroleptics and antichorea medications showed significant effects in the cUHDRS, cognitive measures and multiple objective Q-Motor measures, with strong p-values. These effects are intriguing and were maintained throughout the study. In hindsight, patients on neuroleptics and antichoreatic drugs should have been excuded; unfortunately, they were not.

Q. Were any significant side effects or safety concerns reported during the study?

Pridopidine was shown to be well tolerated and safe. These findings are in line with results from previous studies and show that this drug could easily be made available to patients worldwide. Note that the current dose of 45 mg BID is far below the doses tested in the PRIDE-HD study, which went up to doses of 112.5 mg BID and also showed no relevant safety concerns. At the same time, some patients have been treated with 45 mg BID for several years in open-label studies, such as OPEN-HART.10,11 Furthermore, the safety aspect is also clinically supported by the high retention rate of 92% in the PROOF-HD study, despite its duration of 1.5 years.

Q. Why was the primary endpoint not achieved, and what factors might have contributed to this?

The TFC score is a difficult endpoint to meet as it changes slowly, and clinical trials are conducted over limited timespans. Furthermore, it is often difficult to assess improvements in the TFC; for example, if people do better in a trial, it does not mean that they can quickly return to their previous job or restart activities of daily living that were taken over by caregivers in the meantime, such as doing their laundry. Assessing specific domains, such as motor or cognition, is generally easier.

Q. How do these findings compare with previous studies or treatments for Huntington’s disease?

The efficacy profile of pridopidine observed in the secondary measures is unique. No medication in HD has yet shown evidence for efficacy in motor, cognitive and global domains at the same time. Pridopidine is the first drug to show benefits on objective, unbiased Q-Motor measures across two independent phase II/III trials. This is a robust clinical observation since these measures are quantitative and free from the placebo effect. We have not yet had so much cumulative evidence for positive effects across domains and studies of any drug in HD.

Q. How will these findings be used to inform future treatment decisions? What will be the next steps in the development of pridopidine?

Given the unmet medical needs and the recent failure of other trials, I believe that the cumulative evidence for a beneficial central effect of pridopidine is strong. The unbiased Q-Motor measures have now demonstrated sustained motor effects across the PRIDE-HD and PROOF-HD studies. No similar effects in cUHDRS and cognitive scales have been observed in other trials. In my opinion, pridopidine should be made available to patients with HD who do not take neuroleptics and antichoreatic medications. Given the present evidence, I wonder whether a conditional approval of pridopidine would be a way to explore its full potential for those living with HD. Another interesting perspective, which could be explored, would be to test pridopidine in prodromal gene carriers.

3

References

List View
Grid View
1
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Medina AMahjoub YShaver LPringsheim TPrevalence and incidence of Huntington’s disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysisMov Disord2022;37:232735DOI10.1002/mds.29228.

2
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

ClinicalTrials.govPridopidine’s outcome on function in Huntington’s disease, PROOF-HD. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04556656Available athttps://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04556656 (Date last accessed5 July 2023).

3
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

Huntington’s Disease NewsAAN 2023: Pridopidine phase III trial misses goal, but benefits seen for some2023Available athttps://huntingtonsdiseasenews.com/news/aan-2023-pridopidine-phase-3-trial-benefits-some-patients/ (Date last accessed5 July 2023).

4
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 American Academy of Neurology. Pl5 – clinical trials plenary sessionAvailable atwww.aan.com/MSA/Public/Events/Details/15606 (Date last accessed17 July 2023).

5
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Bachoud-Lévi A-CFerreira JMassart Ret alInternational guidelines for the treatment of Huntington’s diseaseFront Neurol2019;10:710DOI10.3389/fneur.2019.00710.

6
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Ryskamp DWu JGeva Met alThe sigma-1 receptor mediates the beneficial effects of pridopidine in a mouse model of Huntington’s diseaseNeurobiol Dis2017;97:4659DOI10.1016/j.nbd.2016.10.006.

7
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Geva MKusko RSoares Het alPridopidine activates neuroprotective pathways impaired in Huntington’s diseaseHum Mol Genet2016;25:397587DOI10.1093/hmg/ddw238.

8
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Grachev IDMeyer PMBecker GAet alSigma-1 and dopamine D2/D3 receptor occupancy of pridopidine in healthy volunteers and patients with Huntington disease: A [18F] Fluspidine and [18F] Fallypride PET studyEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging2021;48:110315DOI10.1007/s00259-020-05030-3.

9
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 Reilmann RMcGarry AGrachev IDet alSafety and efficacy of pridopidine in patients with Huntington’s disease (PRIDE-HD): A phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre, dose-ranging studyLancet Neurol2019;18:16576DOI10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30391-0.

10
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 McGarry AAuinger PKieburtz Ket alAdditional safety and exploratory efficacy data at 48 and 60 months from open-HART, an open-label extension study of pridopidine in Huntington’s diseaseJ Huntingtons Dis2020;9:17384DOI10.3233/JHD-190393.

11
Copy DOIDOI Copied
Visit DOI Link

 McGarry AKieburtz KAbler Vet alSafety and exploratory efficacy at 36 months in open-HART, an open-label extension study of pridopidine in Huntington’s diseaseJ Huntingtons Dis2017;6:18999DOI10.3233/JHD-170241.

4

Article Information

Disclosure

Ralf Reilmann served as Global Coordinating Principle Investigator for Europe in the PROOF-HD trial. He is founding director and owner of the George-Huntington-Institute, a private research institute focused on clinical and preclinical research in Huntington’s disease, and QuantiMedis, a clinical research organization providing Q-Motor (quantitative motor) services in clinical trials and research. He holds appointments at the Departmentt of Radiology of the University of Muenster and at the Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen. He served as elected member of the Steering Committees of the European Huntington Disease Network (EHDN) and the Huntington Study Group (HSG), co-chair of the Task Force on Huntington’s disease and member of the Task Force on Technology of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (IPMDS). He has provided consulting services, advisory board functions, clinical trial services, quantitative motor analyses, and/or lectures for Actelion, Alnylam, Amarin, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, AskBio, Cure Huntington Disease Initiative Foundation (CHDI), Desitin, Hoffmann-La Roche, IONIS, Ipsen, Lundbeck, MEDA Pharma, Medivation, Mitoconix, Neurosearch, Novartis, Omeros, Pfizer, Prana Biotechnology, Prilenia, PTC Therapeutics, Raptor, Siena Biotech, Solaxa, Temmler Pharma, Teva, uniQure, Vaccinex, Voyager, Wave Life Sciences and Zevra. He has received grant support from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), the Cure Huntington Disease Initiative Foundation (CHDI), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), the Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegeneration und Entzündung (DZNE), the European Union’s 7th Framework Program (EU-FP7) and Horizon2020 Innovative Medicine Initiative 2 program (IMI2), the European Huntington Disease Network (EHDN), the High-Q-Foundation, the National Institute of Health (NIH), and the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Compliance With Ethics

This article involves a review of the literature and did not involve any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

Authorship

This is an expert interview and as such has not undergone the journal’s standard peer review process.

Correspondence

Ralf ReilmannGeorge-Huntington-Institute, R&D-Campus, Technology ParkWilhelm-Schickard-Strasse 15, 48149 MuensterGermanyralf.reilmann@ghi-muenster.de

Support

No funding was received in the publication of this article.

Access

This article is freely accessible at touchNEUROLOGY.com © Touch Medical Media 2023

Acknowledgements

Medical writing support was provided by Touch Medical Media and funded by Touch Medical Media.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the writing of this article.

Received

2023-07-03

5

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF

This Functionality is for
Members Only

Explore the latest in medical education and stay current in your field. Create a free account to track your learning.

Close Popup