Trending Topic

4 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Welcome to this issue of touchREVIEWS in Neurology, where we explore significant advances in neurology, cognitive health, and wearable technology in the management of various chronic conditions. This issue brings together a collection of expert perspectives and research that spans innovative therapies, preventive strategies, and case studies, each offering critical insights for clinicians and researchers. […]

2 mins

Advances in Surgical Options for Medically Refractory Epilepsy

Paul R Gigante, Robert R Goodman
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: May 15th 2012 European Neurological Review, 2012;7(2):140-4 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/ENR.2012.07.02.140
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

The evolution of surgical treatment for medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) has been influenced over the last decade by substantial advancements in imaging- and device-related technology, as well as an expanding assemblage of prospective data that support the utilisation of surgery for MRE. These data, which have grown to include randomised trials and long-term follow up for established surgery, as well as large series for investigational procedures, have demonstrated safe, efficacious results with proper patient selection. Prospective randomised trials of three surgically implanted neuromodulatory devices, vagus nerve stimulators, deep brain stimulators and responsive neurostimulators have demonstrated safety and significant seizure frequency reduction. Numerous studies have provided strong evidence for the efficacy and safety of temporal lobe resective surgery and recent studies have focused on applying alternative approaches to open resective surgery for patients presumed to have a medial temporal seizure focus. These alternatives include stereotactic radiosurgery, radiofrequency ablation and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided laser technique for thermal ablation. Current evidence for these new surgical options for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy will be presented and discussed.

Keywords

Epilepsy, deep brain stimulation, surgery, neurostimulation, neurostimulator, neuromodulation, refractory, radiosurgery, vagus, temporal lobe epilepsy, responsive

2

Article

Neuromodulation Devices
Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), first used for seizure treatment in the 1880s, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1997 after decades of animal studies demonstrating reduction of chemically induced seizures,1,2 and subsequent promising human trials beginning in the early 1990s. Since FDA approval, VNS technology has been improved, with smaller neurostimulator/battery and simplified wire and connection. After exposure of the left vagus nerve distal to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, two bipolar electrodes are placed around the nerve and connected to a subcutaneously implanted, programmable stimulation device below the level of the clavicle. Stimulation is typically at high frequency and cycles between periods on (typically 30 seconds) and off (typically several minutes). To date, the physiological mechanism of VNS on seizure activity remains incompletely understood. As identified broadly in neuronal networks involved in seizure pathophysiology, VNS studies indicate that stimulation influences activity in the thalamus and limbic structures, alters cerebral blood flow and influences neurotransmitter and amino acid concentrations.3–5

Initially, two blinded, randomised controlled trials comparing high and low VNS amplitude stimulation in patients over 12 years old with partial seizures demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in seizure frequency in the high-stimulation (25–28 %) group compared to the low-stimulation (6–15 %) group.6,7 Multiple prospective and retrospective series followed, reporting seizure reduction outcomes in variable epilepsy populations.

Recently, the first meta-analysis of VNS trials identified 74 clinical studies containing outcomes data, of which 15 studies produced Class I, II, or III evidence. In a pooled analysis of 2,634 patients, the authors determined the efficacy of VNS to be a ≥50 % reduction in seizure frequency in 50.6 % of patients; a ≥90 % seizure reduction in 12.2 %; and seizure freedom in 4.6 % of patients. The mean seizure frequency reduction was 44.6 % amongst 1,789 patients with available percentage reduction data. Despite a large volume of pooled data, the wide variability in follow-up, ranging from three months to five years, and non-controlled variables such as medication changes, indicate the continued need for a randomised controlled trial with long-term follow-up.

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Zabara J, Inhibition of experimental seizures in canines by
    repetitive vagal stimulation, Epilepsia, 1992;33:1005–12.

  2. Woodbury DM, Woodbury JW, Effects of vagal stimulation
    on experimentally induced seizures in rats, Epilepsia,
    1990;31(Suppl. 2):S7–19.

  3. Aalbers M, Vles J, Klinkenberg S, et al., Animal models for
    vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy, Exp Neurol,
    2011;230:167–75.

  4. Dedeurwaerdere S, Vonck K, De Herdt V, et al.,
    Neuromodulation with levetiracetam and vagus
    nerve stimulation in experimental animal models of
    epilepsy, Acta Neurol Belg, 2006;106:91–7.

  5. Neu P, Heuser I, Bajbouj M, Cerebral blood flow during
    vagus nerve stimulation–a transcranial Doppler study,
    Neuropsychobiology, 2005;51:265–8.

  6. Handforth A, DeGiorgio CM, Schachter SC, et al., Vagus nerve
    stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures: a randomized
    active-control trial, Neurology, 1998;51:48–55.

  7. Ben-Menachem E, Manon-Espaillat R, Ristanovic R, et al.,
    Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures:
    1. A controlled study of effect on seizures. First International
    Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group, Epilepsia,
    1994;35:616–26.

  8. Englot DJ, Chang EF, Auguste KI, Vagus nerve stimulation for
    epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of
    response, J Neurosurg, 2011;115(6):1248–55.

  9. Follett KA, Weaver FM, Stern M, et al., Pallidal versus
    subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease,
    N Engl J Med, 2010;362:2077–91.

  10. Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, et al., A randomized
    trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease,
    N Engl J Med, 2006;355:896–908.

  11. Lozano AM, Giacobbe P, Hamani C, et al., A multicenter pilot
    study of subcallosal cingulate area deep brain stimulation
    for treatment-resistant depression, J Neurosurg,
    2012;116(2):315–22.

  12. Goodman WK, Foote KD, Greenberg BD, et al., Deep brain
    stimulation for intractable obsessive compulsive disorder:
    pilot study using a blinded, staggered-onset design,
    Biol Psychiatry, 2010;67:535–42.

  13. Ackermans L, Duits A, van der Linden C, et al., Double-blind
    clinical trial of thalamic stimulation in patients with Tourette
    syndrome, Brain, 2011;134:832–44.

  14. Wright GD, McLellan DL, Brice JG, A double-blind trial of
    chronic cerebellar stimulation in twelve patients with severe
    epilepsy, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1984;47:769–74.

  15. Gigante PR, Goodman RR, Alternative surgical approaches in
    epilepsy, Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2011;11:404–8.

  16. Velasco M, Velasco F, Velasco AL, et al., Subacute electrical
    stimulation of the hippocampus blocks intractable temporal
    lobe seizures and paroxysmal EEG activities, Epilepsia,
    2000;41:158–69.

  17. Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, et al., Electrical stimulation of
    the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory
    epilepsy, Epilepsia, 2010;51:899–908.

  18. US Food and Drug Administration, Neurological Devices
    Panel Meeting. Available at: www.fda.gov/downloads/
    AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDe
    vices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/NeurologicalDevices
    Panel/UCM206524.pdf (accessed 15 November 2011).

  19. Health USNIo, Controlled Randomized Stimulation Versus
    Resection (CoRaStiR). Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/
    ct2/show/NCT00431457 (accessed 15 November 2011).

  20. Health USNIo, A Multicenter Study of hippocampal electrical
    stimulation (METTLE) 2011. Available at:
    http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00717431?term=
    A+Multicenter+Study+of+Hippocampal+Electrical+
    Stimulation.&rank=1 (accessed 15 November 2011).

  21. Morrell MJ, RNS System Pivotal Investigators. Results of a
    multicenter double blinded randomized controlled pivotal
    investigation of the RNS(TM) system for treatment of
    intractable partial epilepsy in adults, Presented at: the 63rd
    Annual American Epilepsy Society Meeting, Boston, MA, US,
    4–8 December 2009.

  22. Vossler D, Doherty M, Goodman R, et al., Early safety
    experience with a fully implanted intracranial responsive
    neurostimulator for epilepsy, Presented at: the 58th Annual
    Meeting of the American Epilepsy Society Meeting, New
    Orleans, Louisiana, US, 3–7 December 2004.

  23. Henry TR, Chupin M, Lehericy S, et al., Hippocampal sclerosis
    in temporal lobe epilepsy: findings at 7 T(1), Radiology,
    2011;261:199–209.

  24. Labate A, Cerasa A, Aguglia U, et al., Voxel-based
    morphometry of sporadic epileptic patients with
    mesiotemporal sclerosis, Epilepsia, 2010;51:506–10.

  25. Bernasconi N, Duchesne S, Janke A, et al., Whole-brain
    voxel-based statistical analysis of gray matter and white
    matter in temporal lobe epilepsy, Neuroimage, 2004;23:717–23.

  26. Niemeyer P, The transventricular amygdalohippocampectomy in
    temporal lobe epilepsy, Springfield, Illinois: CC Thomas, 1958.

  27. Yasargil MG, Teddy PJ, Roth P, Selective amygdalohippocampectomy.
    Operative anatomy and surgical
    technique, Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg, 1985;12:93–123.

  28. Wyler AR, Hermann BP, Somes G, Extent of medial temporal
    resection on outcome from anterior temporal lobectomy: a
    randomized prospective study, Neurosurgery, 1995;37:982–90.

  29. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, et al., A randomized,
    controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy,
    N Engl J Med, 2001;345:311–8.

  30. Spencer SS, Berg AT, Vickrey BG, et al., Initial outcomes in the
    Multicenter Study of Epilepsy Surgery, Neurology, 2003;61:1680–5.

  31. Goldring S, Edwards I, Harding GW, et al., Results of anterior
    temporal lobectomy that spares the amygdala in patients
    with complex partial seizures, J Neurosurg, 1992;77:185–93.

  32. Feindel W, Rasmussen T, Temporal lobectomy with
    amygdalectomy and minimal hippocampal resection: review
    of 100 cases, Can J Neurol Sci, 1991;18:603–5.

  33. Olivier A, Relevance of removal of limbic structures in
    surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy, Can J Neurol Sci,
    1991;18:628–35.

  34. Paglioli E, Palmini A, Portuguez M, et al., Seizure and
    memory outcome following temporal lobe surgery: selective
    compared with nonselective approaches for hippocampal
    sclerosis, J Neurosurg, 2006;104:70–8.

  35. Shamim S, Wiggs E, Heiss J, et al., Temporal lobectomy:
    resection volume, neuropsychological effects, and seizure
    outcome, Epilepsy Behav, 2009;16:311–4.

  36. Awad IA, Katz A, Hahn JF, et al., Extent of resection in
    temporal lobectomy for epilepsy. I. Interobserver analysis
    and correlation with seizure outcome, Epilepsia,
    1989;30:756–62.

  37. Joo EY, Han HJ, Lee EK, et al., Resection extent versus
    postoperative outcomes of seizure and memory in mesial
    temporal lobe epilepsy, Seizure, 2005;14:541–51.

  38. Schramm J, Lehmann TN, Zentner J, et al., Randomized
    controlled trial of 2.5-cm versus 3.5-cm mesial temporal
    resection in temporal lobe epilepsy – Part 1: intent-to-treat
    analysis, Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2011;153:209–19.

  39. Tellez-Zenteno JF, Dhar R, Wiebe S, Long-term seizure
    outcomes following epilepsy surgery: a systematic review
    and meta-analysis, Brain, 2005;128:1188–98.

  40. McIntosh AM, Kalnins RM, Mitchell LA, et al., Temporal
    lobectomy: long-term seizure outcome, late recurrence and
    risks for seizure recurrence, Brain, 2004;127:2018–30.

  41. de Tisi J, Bell GS, Peacock JL, et al., The long-term outcome
    of adult epilepsy surgery, patterns of seizure remission, and
    relapse: a cohort study, Lancet, 2011;378:1388–95.

  42. Heikkinen ER, Konnov B, Melnikov L, et al., Relief of epilepsy
    by radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations,
    Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 1989;53:157–66.

  43. Kida Y, Kobayashi T, Tanaka T, et al., Seizure control after
    radiosurgery on cerebral arteriovenous malformations,
    J Clin Neurosci, 2000;7(Suppl. 1):6–9.

  44. Schrottner O, Eder HG, Unger F, et al., Radiosurgery in
    lesional epilepsy: brain tumors, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg,
    1998;70(Suppl. 1):50–6.

  45. Regis J, Rey M, Bartolomei F, et al., Gamma knife surgery in
    mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a prospective multicenter
    study, Epilepsia, 2004;45:504–15.

  46. Quigg M, Broshek DK, Barbaro NM, et al., Neuropsychological
    outcomes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for mesial
    temporal lobe epilepsy: a prospective multicenter study,
    Epilepsia, 2011;52:909–16.

  47. Health UNIo, Radiosurgery or Open Surgery for Epilepsy Trial
    (ROSE). Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
    NCT00860145?term=radiosurgery+and+surgery+
    epilepsy&rank=1 (accessed 2 December 2011).

  48. Vladyka V, [Surgical treatment of epilepsy and its application
    in temporal epilepsy], Cesk Neurol Neurochir, 1978;41:95–106.

  49. Liscak R, Malikova H, Kalina M, et al. Stereotactic
    radiofrequency amygdalohippocampectomy in the treatment
    of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, Acta Neurochir (Wien),
    2010;152:1291–8.

  50. Kalina M, Lisck R, Vojtech Z, et al., Stereotactic
    amygdalohippocampectomy for temporal lobe
    epilepsy: promising results in 16 patients, Epileptic Disord,
    2007;9(Suppl. 1):S68–74.

  51. Malikova H, Vojtech Z, Liscak R, et al., Stereotactic
    radiofrequency amygdalohippocampectomy for the treatment
    of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: correlation of MRI with
    clinical seizure outcome, Epilepsy Res, 2009;83:235–42.

  52. Malikova H, Vojtech Z, Liscak R, et al., Microsurgical and
    stereotactic radiofrequency amygdalohippocampectomy for
    the treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: different
    volume reduction, similar clinical seizure control,
    Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2010;88:42–50.

  53. Curry D, Gowda A, McNichols R, et al., Stereotactic
    MRI-guided Laser Ablation of Epileptogenic Foci in Children,
    Presented at: the American Epilepsy Society 65th Annual
    Meeting, Baltimore, MD, US, 2–6 December 2011.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

Paul R Gigante has no conflicts of interest to declare. Robert R Goodman serves as a consultant for NeuroPace, Inc.

Correspondence

Paul R Gigante, Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th street, 4th floor, New York, NY 10032, US. E: pg2223@columbia.edu

Received

2012-05-06T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup