Trending Topic

4 mins

Trending Topic

Developed by Touch
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked

Welcome to this issue of touchREVIEWS in Neurology, where we explore significant advances in neurology, cognitive health, and wearable technology in the management of various chronic conditions. This issue brings together a collection of expert perspectives and research that spans innovative therapies, preventive strategies, and case studies, each offering critical insights for clinicians and researchers. […]

2 mins

Advances in our Understanding of the Pathophysiology, Detection and Management of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy

Octavio M Pontes-Neto, Eitan Auriel, Steven M Greenberg
Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Published Online: May 15th 2012 European Neurological Review, 2012;7(2):134-9 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/ENR.2012.07.02.134
Select a Section…
1

Abstract

Overview

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is pathologically defined as the deposition of amyloid protein, most commonly the amyloid β peptide (Aβ), primarily within the media and adventitia of small and medium-sized arteries of the leptomeninges, cerebral and cerebellar cortex. This deposition likely reflects an imbalance between Aβ production and clearance within the brain and leads to weakening of the overall structure of brain small vessels, predisposing patients tolobar intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), brain ischaemia and cognitive decline. CAA is associated with markers of small vessel disease, like lobar microbleeds and white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, it can be now be diagnosed during life with reasonable accuracy by clinical and neuroimaging criteria. Despite the lack of a specific treatment for this condition, the detection of CAA may help in the management of patients, regarding the prevention of major haemorrhagic complications and genetic counselling. This review discusses recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology, detection and management of CAA.

Keywords

Amyloid angiopathy, intracerebral haemorrhage, cognitive decline, stroke, amyloid

2

Article

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a disorder of the central nervous system characterised by the deposition of amyloid proteins in the wall of small- to medium-sized vessels, most frequently arteries, within the leptomeninges and cortex of the brain.1 In vessels affected by CAA, local muscle and elastic elements of the arterial wall are lost and replaced by amyloid fibrils, primarily the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide. Since the first description of neurovascular amyloid deposition in 1909 by Gustav Oppenheim, sound scientific evidence has supported the concept that the associated disruption of the overall structure of those small vessels predisposes to both ischaemic small vesseldisease and cerebral haemorrhage.2–4

Sporadic CAA is a major cause of lobar intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and cognitive decline in the elderly, including the normotensive population.5,6 Hereditary forms of CAA are generally rare, usually more severe and earlier in onset. Rare non-Aβ familial CAAs can also present clinically with lobar ICH.7 Regarding sporadic CAA, two major challenges persist:

  • a definitive diagnosis requires a neuropathological exam; and8
  • no treatment or preventive strategy for CAA or CAA-ICH has been firmly established.

Nevertheless, in the last decades of research, there has been remarkable progress in our understanding of this condition. CAA pathology has been associated with markers of small vessel disease, including lobar cerebral microbleeds (CMB) and white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).9–11 The availability of MRI sequences that are particularly sensitive to susceptibility effects like the T2* gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) now allow reliable assessment of an individual’s haemorrhagic burden over time and reasonable accuracy by clinical and neuroimaging diagnostic criteria.10–13 As our understanding of CAA pathophysiology evolves, specific targets have been identified as candidates for the prevention and treatment of this condition.14 As newresearch tools such as the Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) or other amyloid-imaging agents for positron emission tomography (PET) scan become incorporated into clinical practice, it may also be possible to detect vascular amyloid deposition in the brain noninvasively in living patients, perhaps before an ICH or significant cognitive decline.15

To view the full article in PDF or eBook formats, please click on the icons above.

2

References

  1. Okazaki H, Reagan TJ, Campbell RJ, Clinicopathologic
    studies of primary cerebral amyloid angiopathy,
    Mayo Clin Proc, 1979;54:22–31.

  2. Oppenheim G, Über “drusige Nekrosen” in der
    Grosshirnrinde, Neurol Centralbl, 1909;28:410–3.

  3. Vinters HV, Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, A critical
    review, Stroke, 1987;18:311–24.

  4. Greenberg SM, Vonsattel JP, Stakes JW, et al., The clinical
    spectrum of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: presentations
    without lobar hemorrhage, Neurology, 1993;43(10):2073–9.

  5. Neuropathology Group, Medical Research Council Cognitive
    Function and Aging Study. Pathological correlates of
    late-onset dementia in a multicentre, community-based
    population in England and Wales. Neuropathology Group of
    the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and
    Ageing Study (MRC CFAS), Lancet, 2001;357(9251):169–75.

  6. Pfeifer LA, White LR, Ross GW, et al., Cerebral amyloid
    angiopathy and cognitive function: the HAAS autopsy
    study, Neurology, 2002;58(11):1629–34.

  7. Palsdottir A, Snorradottir AO, Thorsteinsson L, Hereditary
    cystatin C amyloid angiopathy: genetic, clinical, and
    pathological aspects, Brain Pathol, 2006;16(1):55–9.

  8. Greenberg SM, Vonsattel JP, Diagnosis of cerebral amyloid
    angiopathy, sensitivity and specificity of cortical biopsy,
    Stroke, 1997;28:1418–22.

  9. Scharf J, Brauherr E, Forsting M, Sartor K, Significance of
    haemorrhagic lacunes on MRI in patients with hypertensive
    cerebrovascular disease and intracerebral haemorrhage,
    Neuroradiology, 1994;36:504–8.

  10. Offenbacher H, Fazekas F, Schmidt R, et al., MR of cerebral
    abnormalities concomitant with primary intracerebral
    hematomas, Am J Neuroradiol, 1996;17:573–8.

  11. Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Roob G, et al., Histopathologic analysis
    of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR
    images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral
    hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-related
    microbleeds, Am J Neuroradiol, 1999;20:637–42.

  12. Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C, et al., Cerebral
    microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation,
    Lancet Neurol, 2009;8(2):165–74.

  13. Knudsen KA, Rosand J, Karluk D, Greenberg SM, Clinical
    diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: validation of the
    Boston criteria, Neurology, 2001;56:537–9.

  14. Auriel E, Greenberg SM, The pathophysiology and clinical
    presentation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Curr Atheroscler
    Rep, 2012;14(4):343–50.

  15. Johnson KA, Gregas M, Becker JA, et al., Imaging of amyloid
    burden and distribution in cerebral amyloid angiopathy,
    Ann Neurol, 2007;62(3):229–34.

  16. Goldgaber D, Lerman MI, McBride OW, et al.,
    Characterization and chromosomal localization of a cDNA
    encoding brain amyloid of Alzheimer’s disease, Science,
    1987;235:877–80.

  17. Haass C, Schlossmacher MG, Hung AY, et al., Amyloid
    beta-peptide is produced by cultured cells during normal
    metabolism, Nature, 1992;359:322–5.

  18. Robakis NK, Ramakrishna N, Wolfe G, Wisniewski HM,
    Molecular cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding
    the cerebrovascular and the neuritic plaque amyloid
    peptides, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1987;84:4190–4.

  19. Busciglio J, Gabuzda DH, Matsudaira P, Yankner BA,
    Generation of beta- amyloid in the secretory pathway in
    neuronal and nonneuronal cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
    1993;90:2092–6.

  20. Rostagno A, Lal R, Ghiso J, Protein misfolding, aggregation,
    and fibril formation: common features of cerebral and
    non-cerebral amyloid diseases. In: Dawbarn D, Allen S (eds),
    The Neurobiology of Alzheimer’s Disease, Oxford: Oxford
    University Press, 2007;133–60.

  21. Hartz AM, Bauer B, Soldner EL, et al., Amyloid-β contributes
    to blood–brain barrier leakage in transgenic human amyloid
    precursor protein mice and in humans with cerebral
    amyloid angiopathy, Stroke, 2012;43:514–23.

  22. Herzig MC, Van Nostrand WE, Jucker M, Mechanism of
    cerebral beta-amyloid angiopathy: murine and cellular
    models, Brain Pathol, 2006;16(1):40–54.

  23. Fukuchi K, Ho L, Younkin SG, et al., High levels of
    circulating beta-amyloid peptide do not cause cerebral
    beta-amyloidosis in transgenic mice, Am J Pathol,
    1996;149(1):219–27.

  24. Burgermeister P, Calhoun ME, Winkler DT, Jucker M,
    Mechanisms of cerebrovascular amyloid deposition.
    Lessons from mouse models, Ann N Y Acad Sci,
    2000;903:307–16.

  25. Eisele YS, Obermüller U, Heilbronner G, et al., Peripherally
    applied Abeta-containing inoculates induce cerebral
    beta-amyloidosis, Science, 2010;330:980–2.

  26. Garcia-Alloza M, Gregory J, Kuchibhotla KV, et al.,
    Cerebrovascular lesions induce transient β-amyloid
    deposition, Brain, 2011;134:3697–707.

  27. Vinters HV, Wang ZZ, Secor DL, Brain parenchymal and
    microvascular amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease,
    Brain Pathol, 1996;6:179–95.

  28. Winkler DT, Bondolfi L, Herzig MC, et al., Spontaneous
    hemorrhagic stroke in a mouse model of cerebral
    amyloid angiopathy, J Neurosci, 2001;21:1619–27.

  29. Greenberg SM, Nandigam RN, Delgado P, et al.,
    Microbleeds versus macrobleeds: evidence for distinct
    entities, Stroke, 2009;40(7):2382–6.

  30. Mandybur TI, Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: the vascular
    pathology and complications, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol,
    1986;45(1):79–90.

  31. Vonsattel JP, Myers RH, Hedley-Whyte ET, et al., Cerebral
    amyloid angiopathy without and with cerebral
    hemorrhages: a comparative histological study,
    Ann Neurol, 1991;30:637–49.

  32. Revesz T, Ghiso J, Lashley T, et al., Cerebral amyloid
    angiopathies: a pathologic, biochemical, and genetic view,
    J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 2003;62:885–98.

  33. Fisher CM, Pathological observations in hypertensive
    cerebral hemorrhage, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol,
    1971;30:536–50.

  34. Neuropathology Group. Medical Research Council Cognitive
    Function and Aging Study (MRC CFAS), Pathological
    correlates of late-onset dementia in a multicentre,
    community-based population in England and Wales,
    Lancet, 2001;357:169–75.

  35. Jellinger KA, Alzheimer disease and cerebrovascular
    pathology: an update, J Neural Transm, 2002;109:813–36.

  36. Ellis RJ, Olichney JM, Thal LJ, et al., Cerebral amyloid
    angiopathy in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s
    disease: the CERAD experience, Part XV, Neurology,
    1996;46:1592–6.

  37. Sudlow C, Martínez González NA, Kim J, Clark C, Does
    apolipoprotein E genotype influence the risk of ischemic
    stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid
    hemorrhage? Systematic review and metaanalyses of
    31 studies among 5961 cases and 17,965 controls,
    Stroke, 2006;37:364–70.

  38. Nicoll JA, Burnett C, Love S, et al., High frequency of
    apolipoprotein E epsilon 2 allele in hemorrhage due to
    cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Ann Neurol, 1997;41:716–21.

  39. Farrer LA, Cupples LA, Haines JL, et al., Effects of age, sex,
    and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E
    genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis, APOE
    and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium, JAMA,
    1997;278:1349–56.

  40. Holtzman DM, Role of apoe/Abeta interactions in the
    pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and cerebral amyloid
    angiopathy, J Mol Neurosci, 2001;17:147–55.

3

Article Information

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Steven M Greenberg, J Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02114, US. E: sgreenberg@partners.org

Support

The authors would like to thank Matthew P Frosch, Andrew Dumas, Edip Gurol and Alison Ayres for their help with the pictures of this manuscript. Octavio M Pontes-Neto receives research support from the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP).

Received

2012-06-16T00:00:00

4

Further Resources

Share
Facebook
X (formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn
Via Email
Mark CompleteCompleted
BookmarkBookmarked
Copy LinkLink Copied
Download as PDF
Close Popup