Home > News > Advances in Therapeutic Options for Gait and Balance in Parkinson’s Disease
Movement Disorders, Parkinson's Disease
Read Time: 9 mins

Advances in Therapeutic Options for Gait and Balance in Parkinson’s Disease

Published Online: March 14th 2012 US Neurology, 2011;7(2):100-108 DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/USN.2011.07.02.100
Authors: Kelvin L Chou, Martijn LTM Müller, Roger L Albin, Nicolaas I Bohnen
Quick Links:
Abstract
Article
Article Information
Abstract:
Overview

There is a need to explore non-dopaminergic approaches to treating balance and gait problems in Parkinson’s disease (PD). There is emerging evidence on the role of cholinergic denervation of the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) thalamus system and falls in PD. Preliminary clinical trial data suggest that the subgroup of PD patients with frequent falls may be suitable candidates for future cholinergic augmentation clinical trials. Recent controlled clinical trials using methylphenidate have been unable to confirm earlier reports of improved gait in PD. Although progressive deterioration of axial motor symptoms occur with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus interna, new preliminary research suggests that other surgical stimulation sites, such as the PPN, may have a potential benefit on gait and balance impairments in PD. Continuing vigorous exercise and physical fitness should be highly encouraged to patients with PD who are at risk of physical deconditioning and fear of falling, but effective antifall physical therapy interventions remain an unmet clinical need.

Keywords

Acetylcholine, dopamine, noradrenergic, deep brain stimulation, exercise, falls, mobility, Parkinson’s disease, pedunculopontine nucleus, striatum, substantia nigra

Article:

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a clinical syndrome consisting of a variable combination of the four cardinal features of resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability.1 Akinesia, defined as inability to initiate movement (e.g. gait ignition failure) or sustain movement (e.g. sudden freezes), is considered by some to be the fifth cardinal feature of PD.2 Most motor features of PD are believed to result mainly from loss of striatal dopamine secondary to the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc).3 The greater the neuronal loss in the SNpc, the lower the striatal dopamine concentration and the more severe the parkinsonian symptoms, particularly bradykinesia.4 The rate of disease progression is highly variable among PD patients. Patients with tremor-predominant disease at onset, for example, tend to progress more slowly than patients with early prominent postural instability and gait disturbances (PIGD).5

Clinical characteristics of parkinsonian locomotor patterns include slow gait and reduced angular excursion of joints such as shoulder, knee, and trunk joints.6,7 With disease progression, stooped posture, short steps, and shuffling (the latter associated with reduced ground clearance and festination) become more prominent features.7–9 Falls are common in PD. Unlike falls in the general population, which result generally from slipping or tripping incidents, the majority of falls in PD occur during routine walking, stopping, turning, and standing up or bending down maneuvers.10,11 One prospective survey of relatively mildly affected PD patients found that 60 % fell during a six-month period and 33 % had multiple falls in this period.12 Fall risk in PD is a bell-shaped function of disease severity,13 reaching a maximum during Hoehn and Yahr stage 3 and decreasing in later stages as patients become less mobile.14,15 The emergence of postural instability marks the onset of increased risk for severe disability in PD patients as up to 40 % of patients with postural instability have multiple falls which may result in injury, including potentially crippling hip and wrist fractures.16

Because of the primary basal ganglia involvement in PD, it is often asserted that postural control impairments are mainly attributable to the dopaminergic deficits. The majority of postural control and gait impairments associated with falls are resistant to dopaminergic treatment.17 While some gait parameters, including stride length, gait velocity, and movement amplitudes, improve with dopaminergic treatment,6,18–21 other features, including temporal parameters (e.g. cadence, swing and stance duration), kinetic abnormalities, and gait variability, are treatment resistant.20,22,23 There is an increasing research effort in exploring non-dopaminergic correlates of gait impairment in PD.

Locomotor and Postural Control Centers
Bipedal locomotion in humans is a complex sensorimotor task requiring dynamic interaction between spinal locomotor pattern generators and hierarchically organized supraspinal locomotion centers in the brainstem, cerebellum, and forebrain. The cerebral networks are believed to modulate locomotion (e.g. gait initiation, termination, velocity, direction, and spatial orientation) and to control balance and gait by integration of multisensory information.24 Our knowledge of the hierarchical network of supraspinal locomotion centers is derived largely from basic science studies in cats, an animal with quadrupedal locomotion.25,26 While it is likely that the anatomic systems for gait and balance are conserved in mammals, the important details of interconnectivity and physiologic regulation are likely to differ significantly. The most important regions are the cerebellar locomotor region, the mesencephalic locomotor region, and the subthalamic locomotor region. The basal ganglia, including the striatum, pallidum, subthalamic nucleus (STN), and substantia nigra, are involved in a number of parallel, functionally segregated cortical–subcortical circuits.27 These circuits support a wide range of sensorimotor, cognitive, and emotional–motivational brain functions. A main role of the basal ganglia is learning and selection of the most appropriate motor or behavioral programs.28 Dopaminergic signaling within the basal ganglia is clearly involved in reward-based learning and action selection.29 Normal dopaminergic function is probably particularly important for establishment, selection, and sequencing of habitual patterns of action.30

Effective integration of sensory information about the visuospatial environment, body, and limb position is essential for postural control. Standing posture, for example, is affected by perturbations of visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive sensory systems.31–33 The specific role of the basal ganglia in postural control is complex and only beginning to be unraveled, but it is believed to be involved in several functions, including:

  • sensory channel integration;
  • selection of automatic postural reactions generated in response to motor and sensory perturbations, such as moving visual environments;
  • motor control flexibility and adaptability: for example, appropriate corrective postural reactions generated in an attempt to prevent a fall are dependent upon the characteristics of the perturbation and environmental changes;
  • regulation of muscle tone; and
  • modulation of the impact of cognitive factors on balance and gait, such as attention, multitasking, and knowledge or expectation of a potential perturbation, or fear of falling.34

Figure 1 provides a schematic overview of the main locomotor and postural control centers in the brain.

Parkinsonian Gait and Deficits in Central Motor Control
PD affects complex gait activities such as gait initiation, braking, and turning. These are gait elements that require the execution of coordinated sequential and/or simultaneous motor programs essential to maintain equilibrium and to generate new movements. Healthy controls are able to harmoniously perform such complex motor tasks, but PD patients exhibit impairment of these functions, resulting in freezing, postural instability, and falls.8,9,35,36 PD patients have difficulty stopping and turning, especially when in confined spaces.7 Freezing of gait, usually manifested as abrupt cessation of leg movement during walking, is a common cause of falls. Sudden freezes may be related to altered cortical regulation of movement execution together with progressive impairment of mesencephalic locomotor center function (see below).37

In patients with early PD, loss of dopamine is predominantly in the posterior putamen, whereas the anterioventral striatum is relatively spared.38 However, the caudate nucleus, which has a more prominent role in striatocortical cognitive functions,27 becomes more involved with advancing PD. Striatofrontal pathways have been implicated as playing a compensatory role in gait control in patients with PD. For example, a brain positron emission tomography study found that gait activity in normal elderly people was associated with a significant decrease in dopamine activity in the putamen, with patients with PD demonstrating a more prominent decrease in the caudate nucleus and frontal cortex.39 Abnormal caudate nucleus function has been implicated in patients with PD and freezing of gait, suggesting failure of the compensatory striatofrontal pathway functions as a possible mechanism.40

Gait in PD during a freezing episode can be improved by simple sensory cues, such as visual (guiding stripes on the floor) or auditory cues.41–45 One interpretation of the beneficial impact of appropriate sensory cueing is that dopamine-depleted basal ganglia are unable to integrate internal/external cues critical to gait and balance. Simple sensory cueing enhances cue salience. An alternative explanation is that accurate external cues facilitate focusing of attentional resources on balance/gait during complex or simultaneous tasks and enable accurate visuospatial orientation.

Cognitive Deficits, Gait Variability, and Falls in Parkinson’s Disease
Alterations in cognitive function (and presumably general cortical function) are linked to gait disturbances.46 In a simple, elegant study, Lundin-Olsson et al. showed that older adults who could not walk and talk (‘stopped walking while talking’) were at higher risk for falling, while those subjects who could walk and talk at the same time were much less prone to falls.47 This observation suggests that simultaneous performance of two attention-demanding tasks (walking and talking) may cause competition for cognitive resources or a challenge for the brain to appropriately prioritize the two tasks, a so-called ‘posture-first’ strategy. Selective cognitive impairments, especially executive function and attentional deficits, are commonly present in patients with mild, early PD.48,49 Dual tasking represents an executive cognitive function heavily dependent on basic operations of working memory and attention.50 Gait and balance are challenged when concurrent tasks have to be performed, which may lead to increased gait variability.51–53

Cognitive or complex sensorimotor (such as carrying a tray) dual interference tasks produce significant differences in gait parameters between PD and control subjects.54–56 Camicioli et al., for example, examined the effects of a simultaneous verbal fluency task on walking in PD subjects with freezing of gait and found that these subjects exhibited a greater increase in the number of steps needed to complete the walk when performing the verbal fluency task.54

Modulation of gait variability, considered a reflection of ability to regulate gait, deteriorates in PD.22,57,58 Competing demands of gait and other tasks may lead to increased gait variability.51–53 Yogev et al. have reported on the increased swing phase duration variability in PD patients compared with control persons.52, Springer et al. and Yogev et al. reported correlations between executive dysfunction and gait variability under usual walking conditions. These correlations became stronger under dual task conditions among elderly non-demented fallers and among patients with PD.52,59 These data support the concept that executive cognitive impairment, especially the limited ability to perform dual tasking, has a negative impact on gait functions, increases gait variability, and results in increased risk of falling.59,60 These data emphasize the importance of cortical dysfunction in gait control in PD patients. A significant component of this cortical dysfunction may be attributable to loss of cholinergic innervation (see below).

Multisystem Degeneration in Parkinson’s Disease—Recent Emphasis on Mobility Impairments and Non-dopaminergic Systems
Although nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation is a key pathobiologic mechanism in PD, there is also converging evidence of degeneration of other monoaminergic (serotonin and norepinephrine) and cholinergic neurotransmitter systems.61,62 The cholinergic system has been implicated in mobility functions in PD not only because of its cortical role in directing attention but also secondary to degeneration of cholinergic cells in the peduncolopontine nucleus in the brainstem.63

The Pedunculopontine Nucleus

The pedunculopontine nucleus–laterodorsal tegmental complex (PPN-LDTC; hereafter referred to as the PPN) is a brainstem locomotor center64 which degenerates in PD.65 The PPN is located in the dorsolateral part of the ponto-mesencephalic tegmentum.66,67 An important point is that the PPN should not be regarded as synonymous with the mesencephalic locomotor region. The latter is a physiologic construct defined by stimulation experiments. The PPN is probably a component of the mesencephalic locomotor region, which appears to be larger than the anatomically defined PPN. Definitions of the PPN vary and there is still debate about its borders, constituents, and internal organization. The PPN is composed of cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons with a wide array of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, and neuromodulators expressed by PPN neurons.68,69 PPN neurons exhibit a wide variety of connections across much of the neuraxis, including important connections to several subcortical regions, other brainstem structures, and the spinal cord.69 The PPN is connected reciprocally with the limbic system, several basal ganglia nuclei (globus pallidus, substantia nigra, STN), and the brainstem reticular formation (for careful reviews see Alam et al.67 and Winn69). The robust interconnections between the PPN and the basal ganglia have led some to regard the PPN as an integral component of the basal ganglia system.70 Some PPN neurons may receive inputs from the deep cerebellar nucleus, a potential link between the basal ganglia and cerebellar motor systems. The caudally directed corticolimbic–ventral striatal–ventral pallidal–PPN–pontomedullary reticular nuclei–spinal cord pathway seems to be involved in the initiation, acceleration, deceleration, and termination of locomotion.66 This pathway is under the control of the deep cerebellar and basal ganglia nuclei at the level of the PPN, particularly via potent inputs from the medial globus pallidus, substantia nigra pars reticulata, and STN.

The PPN sends profuse ascending cholinergic efferent fibers to almost all the thalamic nuclei,64 and thalamic cholinergic terminal density is a measure of PPN integrity. The PPN degenerates in akinetic disorders such as PD and progressive supranuclear palsy.61 There are reports that about 50 % of the large cholinergic neurons of the lateral PPN degenerate in PD.61,63,71–73 A recent study reported post mortem findings of greater loss of cholinergic PPN neurons (34 %) in PD fallers compared with PD non-fallers (see Figure 2).73

PPN dysfunction–degeneration is associated with dopamine-resistant akinesia, one of the most disabling features of PD.65,74 Similarly, experimental PPN destruction in non-human primates is associated with bradykinesia, akinesia, and prominent postural control deficits.73 Stimulation of the PPN increases movement in animals, while inhibition decreases it.74,75 These findings have significant implications for the treatment of PD and related disorders.

The Basal Forebrain Cholinergic System
Cholinergic afferents to the cortex play an important role in a variety of cognitive functions, including attention, memory encoding, and executive function.76 Degeneration of basal forebrain cholinergic corticopetal projections is a prominent feature of PD, and cortical cholinergic deficits of PD exceed those of Alzheimer‘s disease.77 In the Braak model of ascending pathology, basal forebrain degeneration occurs approximately concurrently with substantia nigra pars compacta degeneration. The degree of basal forebrain cholinergic system neurodegeneration, however, varies among PD patients, with some patients exhibiting relative preservation of cortical cholinergic innervation.78 Loss of cortical cholinergic innervation is associated with cognitive deficits in PD and is likely to degrade the attentional and executive functions required for normal gait and postural functions.79 This inference is consistent with recent rodent experiments in which animals with dual nigrostriatal dopaminergic and basal forebrain cholinergic lesions exhibit prominent motor performance deficits in tasks requiring sustained attention.80

Consequences of Multifocal Neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s Disease—Falls and Cholinergic Systems as an Example
Given that PD is a multisystem neurodegeneration, differences in the degree of or rate of degeneration of different central nervous systems may account for differences in phenotypic features. In early-stage PD there is evidence of uniform and severe dopaminergic denervation, but subcortical and cortical cholinergic denervation is more heterogeneous, with some PD subjects exhibiting diminished regional cholinergic innervation and others showing relatively normal regional cholinergic innervation. We showed previously that PD fallers (defined as falls not due to freezing) did not differ in the degree of nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation but had significantly decreased PPN-thalamic and cortical cholinergic innervation compared with non-fallers (see Figure 3).81 Cholinergic system degeneration is probably both a partial cause of and a marker for cognitive dysfunction in PD. Cholinergic system degeneration or dysfunction may also provide a conceptual framework to explain why patients with higher postural instability and gait disturbances in Lewy body parkinsonism are at increased risk of developing dementia.82,83

These data indicate the presence of heterogeneity of cholinergic denervation with PD. We also found evidence of heterogeneity of mobility impairments in our study. A 2 x 2 table shows that distinct subgroups with PD subjects have falls (not attributable to freezing) versus subjects having freezing of gait or a combination of the two (see Table 1). PD subjects with freezing of gait had lower dopamine activity in the caudate nucleus (–12.2 %, analysis of variance F=5.4, p<0.05) but not in the anterior (F=0.6, p=NS) or posterior putamen (F=0.30, p=NS) as shown by [C-11]dihydrotetrabenazine positron emission tomography. Freezing of gait may represent a failure of a dopaminergic compensatory striatofrontal mechanism in PD. Taken together, our findings suggest that specific mobility impairments may be related to neurodegeneration in specific brain regions. The Locus Ceruleus
Other transmitter systems, such as central noradrenergic pathways, are affected in PD and may be involved in gait and balance deficits. Noradrenergic pathways have been implicated in alertness and other cortical attention functions important for gait control in PD.84 The locus eruleus is a small nucleus located in the pontine tegmentum and is the main source of norepinephrine for the brain and spinal cord.85 There is significant degeneration of the locus ceruleus in PD.86

Non-specific White Matter Degeneration and Impaired Balance and Posture in Parkinson’s Disease
Areas with altered signal intensity in white matter are encountered frequently on brain imaging studies in the elderly.87 These white matter abnormalities or leukoaraiosis are commonly associated with small-vessel cerebrovascular disease.88 In otherwise normal older adults, white matter abnormalities have been associated with subtle abnormalities of balance and gait.89–91 As white matter changes are associated with motor dysfunction in otherwise normal elderly adults, comorbid leukoaraiosis could be predicted to contribute also to clinical features in PD. We recently reported that comorbid white matter disease is a greater determinant of axial motor impairment and stooped posture than nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation in PD.92 This conclusion is consistent with an emerging theme in neurodegeneration research: the importance of interactions among vascular, neuro-inflammatory, and neurodegenerative pathologies.93 It is possible that aggressive management of vascular or inflammatory risk factors in PD patients, especially when initiated early in the disease course, could reduce the severity of axial motor dysfunction in PD.

Cholinergic Pharmacotherapy and Motor Functions
These relationships between cholinergic deficits and gait/posture abnormalities raise the question as to whether cholinergic therapy may have a place in the management of mobility problems in PD. Results of a recent placebo-controlled clinical trial showed that treatment with the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil for six weeks reduced the frequency of falls by about 50 % in frequently falling PD subjects (defined as falling or nearly falling more than two times per week).94 Subjects with the highest baseline rate of falls demonstrated the most improvement. However, donepezil did not improve performance on the Berg balance scale, balance confidence scores, or parkinsonian motor scores. One subject withdrew from the study owing to worsening of tremor. While this result needs to be replicated in a larger study, the outcome is encouraging. Interestingly, two subjects with freezing of gait did not appear to benefit from donepezil. Donepezil effects could be mediated by effects in multiple cholinergic pathways. There could be cortical cognitive benefits of improved attention or executive functions95–97 or improved subcortical PPN-thalamus projection function.70

The variable outcomes in this small study, with worsening of tremor in one subject and reduced falls in frequently falling subjects, suggests that caution is in order and that careful selection of patients for cholinergic drug therapy of motor functions will be needed. Cholinergic denervation in PD, especially in non-demented PD subjects, is variable, with some subjects exhibiting relatively preserved cholinergic pathways. Further studies are needed to determine the relationship between specific motor phenotypes in PD and the degree and regional distribution of cholinergic denervation so that an appropriate subset of patients can be selected for potentially beneficial cholinergic augmentation therapy to treat imbalance and falls in PD. Preliminary data, however, indicate that the subgroup of PD patients with frequent falls (two or more per week) may be suitable candidates for future cholinergic augmentation studies.

Cholinesterase inhibitors will augment cholinergic neurotransmission in all cholinergic pathways, potentially decreasing the therapeutic index of this drug class. An emerging potential alternative is selective targeting of nicotinic cholinergic receptors. These ligand-gated ion channels are composed of a variety of subunits with differential distribution of receptor subtypes throughout the brain. Receptor-subtype-specific compounds exist and are under development. Some of these compounds may allow modulation of specific cholinergic pathways. Sarter et al. predict that one family of selective nicotinic agonists will specifically enhance cortical attentional mechanisms.98 In PD patients with cortical cholinergic deficits, compounds of this type may ameliorate the executive–attentional deficits that contribute to gait and postural control problems.

Noradrenergic Pharmacotherapy and Mobility in Parkinson’s Disease
The amphetamine derivative methylphenidate inhibits catecholamine re-uptake, increasing brain dopamine and norepinephrine levels. Methylphenidate is used to treat patients with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Early observations of methylphenidate effects in PD suggest that this compound is not useful for ameliorating cognitive and affective symptoms, but in certain cases it improves attention.99 The effects of methylphenidate on motor deficits are somewhat controversial. Some small, open-label pilot studies have suggested that low-dose methylphenidate may improve gait, and especially freezing, in patients with severe PD, without the need for exogenous levodopa.99–101 This result was not confirmed by other trials.102,103 A recent randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind six-month trial showed that methylphenidate in doses up to 80 mg per day did not improve gait and tended to worsen measures of motor function, sleepiness, and quality of life.104 Atomoxetine is a selective inhibitor of norepinephrine uptake; a small study failed to find significant benefits in gait and balance scores with atomoxetine in PD.105

Effects of Subthalamic Nucleus or Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation on Gait and Balance in Parkinson’s Disease
Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease— Indications and Targets
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical procedure in which a stimulating electrode is implanted within an identified target in the brain and is connected by wires to a pulse generator implanted under the skin overlying the chest. When the generator is turned on, electrical signals are delivered to the brain and improve the symptoms of PD. DBS is considered for PD patients with significant motor fluctuations, characterized by wearing-off or dyskinesias, despite optimal medical management. PD patients with medication-refractory tremor may also be candidates for DBS.106,107 There are three surgical targets for PD: the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus, the STN, and the globus pallidus interna (GPi). Stimulation of the STN and GPi can improve three of the cardinal symptoms of PD (rest tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity). It is well accepted that stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus helps parkinsonian tremor only and does not improve bradykinesia or rigidity.108 Therefore, there is no literature on the effects of thalamic stimulation on gait and balance in PD. The effects of STN or GPi stimulation on gait and balance have been documented but remain somewhat controversial.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease— Short-term Effects on Gait and Balance
Bakker et al. performed a systematic review of early studies examining the effect of STN and GPi DBS on PIGD symptoms in PD.109 Nine studies reported the effects of bilateral GPi stimulation and 10 studies reported the effects of bilateral STN stimulation. Most of the studies included in this review reported results six months after surgery, but there were some studies with follow-up of up to 12 months. Overall, PIGD symptoms significantly improved with both STN and GPi stimulation in both the medication ‘off’ state and ‘on’ state, but more so in the medication ‘off’ state. Both STN and GPi stimulation improved timed tests of PIGD as well as gait and balance performance on quantitative gait analysis and posturography.

These results seem to contradict the results of a recent blinded controlled trial of DBS in PD,110 which reported six-month outcomes of 255 patients randomized to DBS or best medical therapy. While PIGD symptoms were not specifically examined and reported, the motor portion of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) improved significantly and patients had more ‘on’ time with DBS. Despite this, subjects in the DBS arm of this trial had more falls and gait disturbances in the first three months after receiving surgery than subjects in the best medical therapy group. At six months, there were no differences in the percentage of subjects experiencing gait disturbance between the two groups, but falls remained more prominent in the DBS group. In a separate article reporting 24-month outcomes of these subjects after randomization to STN or GPi stimulation,111 the number of patients with falls or gait disturbance at 24 months did not differ significantly between the two different targets.

It is unclear why PIGD scores improve with DBS yet patients undergoing DBS seem to have more falls, at least initially after DBS surgery. The improvement in PIGD scores could simply result from improvement in bradykinesia and rigidity which previously affected gait and balance. Such improved motor function could cause patients to engage in activities that they previously avoided, resulting in more falls. It is also well known that increasing stimulation can transiently worsen dyskinesia, especially with STN stimulation.112 Transient increased dyskinesias may also impact gait and contribute to falls in the short term. There are many other contributors to gait and posture other than bradykinesia, rigidity, and dyskinesia. Such systems, such as the complex network responsible for postural control described earlier, could be directly affected by DBS as well.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease— Long-term Studies on Gait and Balance
A common theme in long-term studies of DBS in PD is the sustained control of cardinal symptoms such as bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity.112–116 An equally common finding in these long-term studies, however, is worsening gait function. One recent study, for example, reported 10-year outcomes of bilateral STN DBS in PD.117 Although improvements in tremor and bradykinesia were sustained, axial motor scores showed progressive deterioration over time (–53.6 % at five years and –101.8 % at 10 years). Posture also significantly deteriorated over time (–80 % both at five and 10 years). This phenomenon seems to occur with both STN and GPi stimulation, and in long-term studies has been attributed to the progression of dopamine-resistant symptoms. A relevant question, however, is whether DBS site placement has differential long-term effects on gait function. Direct comparisons are difficult because most centers typically implant primarily in one site, with more centers choosing the STN. A recently published meta-regression analysis of long-term studies of bilateral DBS addresses potential differences in progression of PIGD features in patients receiving STN versus GPi DBS.118 There were sustained improvements in tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity in both STN and GPi DBS with minimal deterioration over time. Progression of balance and gait deficits, however, apparently varied with DBS site selection. In the ‘on’ medication state, balance and gait initially improved with DBS but by two years were worse than the pre-operative ‘on’ medication state in the STN group, whereas there was no deterioration in postural stability and gait in the GPi group.

These results suggest that the long-term progression of PIGD features may be different with GPi stimulation than with STN stimulation and that GPi is a better target for patients with significant balance and gait problems. The reasons for this discrepancy are not clear, but medications are typically reduced more with STN DBS compared with GPi DBS.111 It is possible that sustained higher levels of dopaminergic medications over time in GPi patients lead to less progression of PIGD symptoms. It may be that there is adaptation to commonly used stimulation settings over time, and that patients receiving STN DBS experience such adaptation over time. A recent study on the 10-year outcome of bilateral STN DBS in PD reported that, although improvements in tremor and bradykinesia were sustained, axial motor scores showed the most progressive deterioration over time (–53.6 % at five years and –101.8 % at 10 years).117 Posture also deteriorated significantly over time. These findings suggest a lack of neuroprotective effects of DBS on PD progression (see Figure 4).

Another group examined whether modifying DBS frequency in patients with STN DBS could improve gait and freezing episodes developing several years after surgery.119 The rationale for this intervention was the finding that low-frequency stimulation of the PPN may improve gait disorders in PD. Freezing seemed to improve with high-voltage 60 Hz stimulation compared with standard or high-voltage 130 Hz stimulation. Brozova et al. found that, of the 12 patients who were switched to 60 Hz stimulation, three could not tolerate the change because of worsened parkinsonian symptoms.120 This suggests that lower-frequency stimulation may not be the answer for everyone who has gait problems after STN DBS. More studies are clearly needed to determine the appropriate patients for low-frequency STN DBS.

Pedunculopontine Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Gait and Balance Dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease
Because of progressive decline in gait and balance functions in PD patients who have undergone DBS, there has been recent interest in other brain targets to address features not helped by STN or GPi DBS. The most promising target is the PPN. Evidence that PPN degeneration/dysfunction occurs in PD and the important role of the PPN in gait and postural stability, coupled with the fact that stimulation of the PPN in animal models increases locomotor activity,74,121,122 led to interest in PPN stimulation for gait dysfunction in PD.

The first two case series of low-frequency PPN stimulation in patients with PD reported both significant improvement in gait and posture and improved UPDRS total motor scores.123,124 Subsequent reports, unfortunately, are not as impressive.125–127 Moro et al. reported six patients with PD who underwent low-frequency unilateral PPN stimulation and demonstrated improvements in falls and freezing of gait at three months compared with the baseline ‘off medication’ state.126 There were, however, no improvements in the UPDRS total motor or in gait/posture scores. Ferraye et al. reported an open-label study of bilateral PPN stimulation in six PD patients who had previously undergone STN DBS but with gait and postural problems unresponsive to STN DBS.125 There was significant improvement in freezing of gait and falls at one year compared with baseline, but blinded ‘on’ and ‘off’ stimulation comparisons at one year failed to demonstrate any difference in gait or posture.

Several possibilities may explain the variability in results of PPN stimulation in PD. First, the PPN is a difficult structure to pin down anatomically in humans and the PPN is difficult to visualize on traditional magnetic resonance sequences.67,128 The regions targeted in recent studies are somewhat different and differential targeting may explain discrepant results. Another factor is the difficulty of finding a suitable stimulation site within the PPN when severe degeneration, such as in PD fallers, has already occurred.73 There may also be differences related to how many different targets are being stimulated. For example, Moro et al.126 investigated unilateral PPN stimulation only, while other studies reported patients with both bilateral STN and PPN stimulation.124,125 A recent study reports significant improvement in axial motor scores when DBS of the PPN is combined with stimulation of the caudal zone incerta in patients with PD.129 The studies by Ferraye et al. and Moro et al. suggest that patients with freezing of gait and falls related to freezing may benefit more from PPN stimulation than patients with postural instability only.125,126 It is clear that further studies are needed to better characterize PPN targeting, patient selection, and efficacy of PPN stimulation and stimulation of other targets on gait and balance dysfunction in PD.

Physical Therapy and Exercise in the Management of Gait and Balance Problems in Parkinson’s Disease
Physical therapy management of gait disorders in people with PD has three key elements.130 The first element is teaching the person how to move more easily and to maintain postural stability by using cognitive strategies. This is known as ‘strategy training’ and targets the primary motor control deficit in the basal ganglia, brainstem, and motor cortex. The second element of physical therapy is the management of secondary sequelae affecting the musculoskeletal and cardiorespiratory systems that occur as a result of deconditioning, reduced physical activity, advanced age, and comorbid conditions. The third element is the promotion of physical activities that assist the person in making lifelong changes in exercise and physical activity habits as well as preventing falls. Current approaches with physical therapy interventions have significant limitations. The strategy training approach depends considerably on patient commitment and intact cognitive capacities. As described above, cognitive impairments may be an important contributor to impaired gait and balance function in PD. The PD patients most in need of rehabilitation of their gait and balance problems may be least able to participate in this therapeutic modality. This is particularly true for patients with more advanced PD, where the prevalence of cognitive impairment, including overt dementia, is high.

A critical review of the literature by Kwakkel et al. noted that the effects of physical therapy are task- and context-specific and have limited long-term carry-over effects in PD patients’ home environments.131 Kwakkel et al. emphasize the need for long-term treatment programs for PD patients. In this respect, exercise programs that can be maintained in the home situation would be preferred. A large body of empiric evidence suggests that exercise programs may be an effective strategy to delay or reverse functional decline for people with PD.132,133 Recent reviews have concluded that exercise is beneficial with regard to physical functioning, health-related quality of life, strength, balance, and gait speed for people with PD, but caution that good-quality research is needed.132,133 A recent meta-analysis of the effects of exercise and motor training on balance and falls in PD conclude a significant but small benefit on balance-related performance measures.134 However, there was no beneficial effect on falls in PD. These findings indicate that it remains unclear whether exercise and motor training alone can effectively reduce falls in PD.

Novel physical therapy and exercise interventions may also be useful. Recent controlled clinical trials show gait improvements with treadmill exercise.135,136 Alternative treatment modalities, such as tai chi,137 have shown modest improvements in gait and balance in PD. Although evidence remains anecdotal, bicycling exercise may be of particular benefit in patients with PD and freezing of gait.37 Further research is needed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of cycling in more advanced PD. It is interesting to note that changes in executive functions occur after acute bouts of passive cycling in PD, suggesting a striatocortically mediated process.138 Combinations of novel pharmacotherapies and novel physical therapy and/or exercise interventions may be useful in delaying or ameliorating gait and balance problems in PD.

Conclusions
Gait disorders and postural instability are common in patients with PD and respond poorly to dopaminergic agents effective for other features of PD. Gait and balance impairments in PD probably result from an intricate interplay of multisystem degenerations and neurotransmitter deficiencies extending beyond loss of dopaminergic nigral neurons. We showed recently that cholinergic denervation, especially of the thalamus, rather than the degree of nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation, is associated with falls in PD. Our results are consistent with a key role for the PPN in the maintenance of balance in humans and with PPN dysfunction/degeneration as a cause of impaired postural control and gait in PD. Other recent evidence suggests that PPN degeneration is associated with akinesia, including gait ignition failure and gait freezing, in PD. Degeneration of cholinergic corticopetal afferents from the basal forebrain complex may play in a role in executive function and attentional deficits contributing to gait and balance dysfunction in PD. Although STN DBS in PD patients produces sustained benefits for tremor and bradykinesia, axial motor function continues to decline. Low-frequency DBS of the PPN is emerging as a treatment for postural and gait disorders in PD, although the PPN is a technically challenging target. New lines of research are emerging exploring non-dopaminergic pharmacologic treatments of gait and balance problems in PD. Cholinergic therapies may benefit frequently falling PD patients. Contrary to open-label experiences, a recent placebo-controlled study did not find gait improvements with methylphenidate therapy in PD. Non-pharmacologic and non-surgical approaches to treating mobility problems in PD emphasize the increasing importance of exercise and physical fitness in PD. As comorbid white matter disease is associated with impaired axial symptoms and increased stooped posture in PD, it is possible that aggressive management of vascular or inflammatory risk factors, especially when initiated early in the disease course, could reduce the severity of axial motor dysfunction in PD.

Article Information:
Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Correspondence

Nicolaas I Bohnen, MD, PhD, Functional Neuroimaging, Cognitive and Mobility Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Box 362, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-9755. E: nbohnen@umich.edu

Received

2011-08-31T00:00:00

References

  1. Quinn N, Parkinsonism-recognition and differential diagnosis, BMJ, 1995;310:447–52.
  2. Factor SA, The clinical spectrum of freezing of gait in atypical parkinsonism, Mov Disord, 2008;23(Suppl. 2):S431–8.
  3. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Blankson S, Lees AJ, A clinicopathologic study of 100 cases of Parkinson’s disease, Arch Neurol, 1993;50:140–8.
  4. Bernheimer H, Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O, et al., Brain dopamine and the syndromes of Parkinson and Huntington. Clinical, morphological and neurochemical correlations, J Neurol Sci, 1973;20:415–55.
  5. Post B, Merkus MP, de Haan RJ, Speelman JD, Prognostic factors for the progression of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review, Mov Disord, 2007;22:1839–51; quiz 1988.
  6. Azulay JP, Van Den Brand C, Mestre D, et al., [Automatic motion analysis of gait in patients with Parkinson disease: effects of levodopa and visual stimulations], Rev Neurol (Paris), 1996;152:128–34. Article in French.
  7. Kemoun G, Defebvre L, [Clinical description, analysis of posture, initiation of stabilized gait], Presse Med, 2001;30:452–9. Article in French.
  8. Murray MP, Sepic SB, Gardner GM, Downs WJ, Walking patterns of men with parkinsonism, Am J Phys Med, 1978;57:278–94.
  9. Nieuwboer A, Dom R, De Weerdt W, et al., Abnormalities of the spatiotemporal characteristics of gait at the onset of freezing in Parkinson’s disease, Mov Disord, 2001;16:1066–75.
  10. Bloem BR, Grimbergen YA, Cramer M, et al., Prospective assessment of falls in Parkinson’s disease, J Neurol, 2001;248:950–8.
  11. Morris ME, Movement disorders in people with Parkinson disease: a model for physical therapy, Phys Ther, 2000;80:578–97.
  12. Bloem BR, Grimbergen YAM, Cramer M, et al., Prospective assessment of falls in Parkinson’s disease, Mov Disord, 1998;10:147.
  13. Pickering RM, Mazibrada G, Wood BH, et al., A meta-analysis of six prospective studies of falls in Parkinson’s disease, Mov Disord, 2004;19:S262.
  14. Bloem BR, van Vugt JP, Beckley DJ, Postural instability and falls in Parkinson’s disease, Adv Neurol, 2001;87:209–23.
  15. Wood BH, Bilclough JA, Bowron A, Walker RW, Incidence and prediction of falls in Parkinson’s disease: a prospective multidisciplinary study, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2002;72:721–5.
  16. Gray P, Hildebrand K, Fall risk factors in Parkinson’s disease, J Neurosci Nurs, 2000;32:222–8.
  17. Bohnen NI, Cham R, Postural control, gait, and dopamine functions in parkinsonian movement disorders, Clin Geriatr Med, 2006;22:797–812.
  18. Bowes SG, Clark PK, Leeman AL, et al., Determinants of gait in the elderly parkinsonian on maintenance levodopa/carbidopa therapy, Br J Clin Pharmacology, 1990;30:13–24.
  19. Ferrandez AM, Blin O, A comparison between the effect of intentional modulations and the action of L-dopa on gait in Parkinson’s disease, Behav Brain Res, 1991;45:177–83.
  20. O’Sullivan JD, Said CM, Dillon LC, et al., Gait analysis in patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations: influence of levodopa and comparison with other measures of motor function, Mov Disord, 1998;13:900–6.
  21. Shan DE, Lee SJ, Chao LY, Yeh SI, Gait analysis in advanced Parkinson’s disease—effect of levodopa and tolcapone, Can J Neurol Sci, 2001;28:70–5.
  22. Blin O, Ferrandez AM, Pailhous J, Serratrice G, Dopa-sensitive and dopa-resistant gait parameters in Parkinson’s disease, J Neurol Sci, 1991;103:51–4.
  23. Ebersbach G, Heijmenberg M, Kindermann L, et al., Interference of rhythmic constraint on gait in healthy subjects and patients with early Parkinson’s disease: evidence for impaired locomotor pattern generation in early Parkinson’s disease., Mov Disord, 1999;14:619–25.
  24. Rossignol S, Dubuc R, Gossard JP, Dynamic sensorimotor interactions in locomotion, Physiol Rev, 2006;86:89–154.
  25. Mori S, Matsui T, Kuze B, et al., Stimulation of a restricted region in the midline cerebellar white matter evokes coordinated quadrupedal locomotion in the decerebrate cat, J Neurophysiol, 1999;82:290–300.
  26. Shik ML, Orlovsky GN, Neurophysiology of locomotor automatism, Physiol Rev, 1976;56:465–501.
  27. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL, Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex, Annu Rev Neurosci, 1986;9:357–81.
  28. Redgrave P, Rodriguez M, Smith Y, et al., Goal-directed and habitual control in the basal ganglia: implications for Parkinson’s disease, Nat Rev Neurosci, 2010;11:760–72.
  29. Balleine BW, O’Doherty JP, Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action, Neuropsychopharmacology, 2010;35:48–69.
  30. Yin HH, Knowlton BJ, The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation, Nat Rev Neurosci, 2006;7:464–76.
  31. Latt LD, Sparto PJ, Furman JM, Redfern MS, The steady-state postural response to continuous sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation, Gait Posture, 2003;18:64–72.
  32. Horak FB, Shupert CL, Dietz V, Horstmann G, Vestibular and somatosensory contributions to responses to head and body displacements in stance, Exp Brain Res, 1994;100:93–106.
  33. Mahboobin A, Loughlin PJ, Redfern MS, Sparto PJ, Sensory re-weighting in human postural control during moving-scene perturbations, Exp Brain Res, 2005;167:260–7.
  34. Visser JE, Bloem BR, Role of the basal ganglia in balancecontrol, Neural Plast, 2005;12:161–74.
  35. Burleigh-Jacobs A, Horak FB, Nutt JG, Obeso JA, Step initiation in Parkinson’s disease: influence of levodopa and external sensory triggers, Mov Disord, 1997;12:206–15.
  36. Giladi N, Treves TA, Simon ES, et al., Freezing of gait in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease, J Neural Transm, 2001;108:53–61.
  37. Snijders AH, Toni I, Ruzicka E, Bloem BR, Bicycling breaks the ice for freezers of gait, Mov Disord, 2011;26:367–71.
  38. Kish SJ, Shannak K, Hornykiewicz O, Uneven pattern of dopamine loss in the striatum of patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, N Engl J Med, 1988;318:876–80.
  39. Ouchi Y, Kanno T, Okada H, et al., Changes in dopamine availability in the nigrostriatal and mesocortical dopaminergic systems by gait in Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 2001;124:784–92.
  40. Bartels AL, de Jong BM, Giladi N, et al., Striatal dopa and glucose metabolism in PD patients with freezing of gait, Mov Disord, 2006;21:1326–32.
  41. Azulay JP, Mesure S, Amblard B, et al., Visual control of locomotion in Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 1999;122:111–20.
  42. Lewis GN, Byblow WD, Walt SE, Stride length regulation in Parkinson’s disease: the use of extrinsic, visual cues, Brain, 2000;123:2077–90.
  43. McIntosh GC, Brown SH, Rice RR, Thaut MH, Rhythmic auditorymotor facilitation of gait patterns in patients with Parkinson’s disease, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1997;62:22–6.
  44. Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR, et al., Rhythmic auditory stimulation in gait training for Parkinson’s disease patients, Mov Dis, 1996;11:193–200.
  45. Howe TE, Lovgreen B, Cody FW, et al., Auditory cues can modify the gait of persons with early-stage Parkinson’s disease: a method for enhancing parkinsonian walking performance?, Clin Rehabilitation, 2003;17:363–7.
  46. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A, Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research, Gait Posture, 2002;16:1–14.
  47. Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y, ‘Stops walkingwhen talking’ as a predictor of falls in elderly people, Lancet, 1997;349:617.
  48. Lees AJ, Smith E, Cognitive deficits in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 1983;106:257–70.
  49. Dubois B, Pillon B, Cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease, J Neurology, 1997;244:2–8.
  50. Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a conceptual view, Psychological Res, 2000;63:289–98.
  51. Bloem BR, Valkenburg VV, Slabbekoorn M, van Dijk JG, The multiple tasks test. Strategies in Parkinson’s disease, Exp Brain Res, 2001;137:478–86.
  52. Yogev G, Giladi N, Peretz C, et al., Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity, and Parkinson’s disease: which aspects of gait are attention demanding?, Eur J Neurosci, 2005;22:1248–56.
  53. Marchese R, Bove M, Abbruzzese G, Effect of cognitive and motor tasks on postural stability in Parkinson’s disease: a posturographic study, Mov Disord, 2003;18:652–8.
  54. Camicioli R, Oken BS, Sexton G, et al., Verbal fluency task effects gait in Parkinson’s disease with motor freezing, J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurology, 1998;11:181–5.
  55. Bond JM, Morris M, Goal-directed secondary motor tasks: their effects on gait in subjects with Parkinson disease, Arch Phys Med Rehabilitation, 2000;81:110–6.
  56. O’Shea S, Morris ME, Iansek R, Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks, Phys Ther, 2002;82:888–97.
  57. Hausdorff JM, Schaafsma JD, Balash Y, et al., Impaired regulation of stride variability in Parkinson’s disease subjects with freezing of gait, Exp Brain Res, 2003;149:187–94.
  58. Hausdorff JM, Cudkowicz ME, Firtion R, et al., Gait variability and basal ganglia disorders: stride-to-stride variations of gait cycle timing in Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease, Mov Disord, 1998;13:428–37.
  59. Springer S, Giladi N, Peretz C, et al., Dual-tasking effects on gait variability: the role of aging, falls, and executive function, Mov Disord, 2006;21:950–7.
  60. Hausdorff JM, Balash J, Giladi N, Effects of cognitive challenge on gait variability in patients with Parkinson’s disease, J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurology, 2003;16:53–8.
  61. Jellinger K, The pedunculopontine nucleus in Parkinson’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy and Alzheimer’s disease, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1988;51:540–3.
  62. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Nervous system pathology in sporadic Parkinson disease, Neurology, 2008;70:1916–25.
  63. Hirsch EC, Graybiel AM, Duyckaerts C, Javoy-Agid F, Neuronal loss in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in Parkinson disease and in progressive supranuclear palsy, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1987;84:5976–80.
  64. Lee MS, Rinne JO, Marsden CD, The pedunculopontine nucleus: its role in the genesis of movement disorders, Yonsei Med J, 2000;41:167–84.
  65. Stein JF, Akinesia, motor oscillations and the pedunculopontine nucleus in rats and men, Exp Neurol, 2009;215:1–4.
  66. Pahapill PA, Lozano AM, The pedunculopontine nucleus and Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 2000;123:1767–83.
  67. Alam M, Schwabe K, Krauss JK, The pedunculopontine nucleus area: critical evaluation of interspecies differences relevant for its use as a target for deep brain stimulation, Brain, 2011;134:11–23.
  68. Heckers S, Geula C, Mesulam M, Cholinergic innervation of the human thalamus: Dual origin and differential nuclear distribution, J Comp Neurol, 1992;325:68–82.
  69. Winn P, How best to consider the structure and function of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: evidence from animal studies, J Neurol Sci, 2006;248:234–50.
  70. Lavoie B, Parent A, Pedunculopontine nucleus in the squirrel monkey: projections to the basal ganglia as revealed by anterograde tract-tracing methods, J Comp Neurol, 1994;344:210–31.
  71. Zweig RM, Jankel WR, Hedreen JC, et al., The pedunculopontine nucleus in Parkinson’s disease, Ann Neurol, 1989;26:41–6.
  72. Gai WP, Halliday GM, Blumbergs PC, et al., Substance Pcontaining neurons in the mesopontine tegmentum are severely affected in Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 1991;114:2253–67.
  73. Karachi C, Grabli D, Bernard FA, et al., Cholinergic mesencephalic neurons are involved in gait and postural disorders in Parkinson disease, J Clin Invest, 2010;120:2745–54.
  74. Jenkinson N, Nandi D, Miall RC, et al., Pedunculopontine nucleus stimulation improves akinesia in a Parkinsonian monkey, Neuroreport, 2004;15:2621–4.
  75. Garcia-Rill E, Houser CR, Skinner RD, et al., Locomotion-inducing sites in the vicinity of the pedunculopontine nucleus, Brain Res Bull, 1987;18:731–8.
  76. Hasselmo ME, Sarter M, Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition, Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011;36:52–73.
  77. Bohnen NI, Kaufer DI, Ivanco LS, et al., Cortical cholinergic function is more severely affected in parkinsonian dementia than in Alzheimer disease: an in vivo positron emission tomographic study, Arch Neurol, 2003;60:1745–8.
  78. Shimada H, Hirano S, Shinotoh H, et al., Mapping of brain acetylcholinesterase alterations in Lewy body disease by PET, Neurology, 2009;73:273–8.
  79. Bohnen NI, Albin RL, The cholinergic system and Parkinson disease, Behav Brain Res, 2011;221:564–73.
  80. Spuz CA, Paolone G, Briscoe S, et al., Deficits in attentional control of balance, mobility, and complex movements in a rat model of early state, multisystem Parkinson disease, Society for Neuroscience, Washington DC, November 2011, Abstract 244.02.
  81. Bohnen NI, Muller ML, Koeppe RA, et al., History of falls in Parkinson disease is associated with reduced cholinergic activity, Neurology, 2009;73:1670–6.
  82. Alves G, Larsen JP, Emre M, et al., Changes in motor subtype and risk for incident dementia in Parkinson’s disease, Mov Disord, 2006;21:1123–30.
  83. Taylor JP, Rowan EN, Lett D, et al., Poor attentional function predicts cognitive decline in patients with non-demented Parkinson’s disease independent of motor phenotype, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2008;79:1318–23.
  84. Grimbergen YA, Langston JW, Roos RA, Bloem BR, Postural instability in Parkinson’s disease: the adrenergic hypothesis and the locus coeruleus, Expert Rev Neurother, 2009;9:279–90.
  85. Moore RY, Bloom FE, Central catecholamine neuron systems: anatomy and physiology of the norepinephrine and epinephrine systems, Annu Rev Neurosci, 1979;2:113–68.
  86. Zarow C, Lyness SA, Mortimer JA, Chui HC, Neuronal loss is greater in the locus coeruleus than nucleus basalis and substantia nigra in Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases, Arch Neurol, 2003;60:337–41.
  87. Gunning-Dixon FM, Raz N, The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: A quantitative review, Neuropsychology, 2000;14:224–32.
  88. Pantoni L, Garcia JH, Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis, Stroke, 1997;28:652–9.
  89. Longstreth WT, Jr, Manolio TA, Arnold A, et al., Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people. The Cardiovascular Health Study, Stroke, 1996;27:1274–82.
  90. Baezner H, Blahak C, Poggesi A, et al., Association of gait and balance disorders with age-related white matter changes: the LADIS study, Neurology, 2008;70:935–42.
  91. Murray ME, Senjem ML, Petersen RC, et al., Functional impact of white matter hyperintensities in cognitively normal elderly subjects, Arch Neurol, 2010;67:1379–85.
  92. Bohnen NI, Muller ML, Zarzhevsky N, et al., Leucoaraiosis, nigrostriatal denervation and motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 2011;134:2358–65.
  93. Schneider JA, Bennett DA, Where vascular meets neurodegenerative disease, Stroke, 2010;41:S144–6.
  94. Chung KA, Lobb BM, Nutt JG, Horak F, Cholinergic augmentation in frequently fallings subjects with Parkinson’s disease, Mov Disord, 2009;24(Suppl. 1):S259.
  95. Ceravolo R, Volterrani D, Frosini D, et al., Brain perfusion effects of cholinesterase inhibitors in Parkinson’s disease with dementia, J Neural Transm, 2006;113:1787–90.
  96. Ahlskog JE, Think before you leap: donepezil reduces falls?, Neurology, 2010;75:1226–7.
  97. Montero-Odasso M, Wells J, Borrie M, Can cognitive enhancers reduce the risk of falls in people with dementia? An open-label study with controls, J Am Geriatr Soc, 2009;57:359–60.
  98. Sarter M, Parikh V, Howe WM, nAChR agonist-induced cognition enhancement: integration of cognitive and neuronal mechanisms, Biochem Pharmacol, 2009;78:658–67.
  99. Pollak L, Dobronevsky Y, Prohorov T, et al., Low dose methylphenidate improves freezing in advanced Parkinson’s disease during off-state, J Neural Transm Suppl, 2007:145–8.
  100. Devos D, Krystkowiak P, Clement F, et al., Improvement of gait by chronic, high doses of methylphenidate in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2007;78:470–5.
  101. Auriel E, Hausdorff JM, Herman T, et al., Effects of methylphenidate on cognitive function and gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study, Clin Neuropharmacol, 2006;29:15–7.
  102. Nutt JG, Carter JH, Carlson NE, Effects of methylphenidate on response to oral levodopa: a double-blind clinical trial, Arch Neurol, 2007;64:319–23.
  103. Auriel E, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N, Methylphenidate for the treatment of Parkinson disease and other neurological disorders, Clin Neuropharmacol, 2009;32:75–81.
  104. Espay AJ, Dwivedi AK, Payne M, et al., Methylphenidate for gait impairment in Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial, Neurology, 2011;76:1256–62.
  105. Jankovic J, Atomoxetine for freezing of gait in Parkinson disease, J Neurol Sci, 2009;284:177–8.
  106. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Gervason C, et al., Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus, Lancet, 1991;337:403–6.
  107. Deuschl G, Bain P, Deep brain stimulation for tremor [correction of trauma]: patient selection and evaluation, Mov Disord, 2002;17(Suppl. 3):S102–11.
  108. Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, et al., Long-term evaluation of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus, J Neurosurg, 2006;104:506–12.
  109. Bakker M, Esselink RA, Munneke M, et al., Effects of stereotactic neurosurgery on postural instability and gait in Parkinson’s disease, Mov Disord, 2004;19:1092–9.
  110. Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, et al., Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 2009;301:63–73.
  111. Follett KA, Weaver FM, Stern M, et al., Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease, N Engl J Med, 2010;362:2077–91.
  112. Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N, et al., Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease, N Engl J Med, 2003;349:1925–34.
  113. Liang GS, Chou KL, Baltuch GH, et al., Long-term outcomes of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2006;84:221–7.
  114. Ostergaard K, Aa Sunde N, Evolution of Parkinson’s disease during 4 years of bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, Mov Disord, 2006;21:624–31.
  115. Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Obeso JA, Lang AE, et al., Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up, Brain, 2005;128:2240–9.
  116. Schupbach WM, Chastan N, Welter ML, et al., Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease: a 5 year follow up, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005;76:1640–4.
  117. Castrioto A, Lozano AM, Poon YY, et al., Ten-year outcome of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: a blinded evaluation, Arch Neurol, 2011;68:1550–6.
  118. St George RJ, Nutt JG, Burchiel KJ, Horak FB, A meta-regression of the long-term effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and gait in PD, Neurology, 2010;75:1292–9.
  119. Moreau C, Defebvre L, Destee A, et al., STN-DBS frequency effects on freezing of gait in advanced Parkinson disease, Neurology, 2008;71:80–4.
  120. Brozova H, Barnaure I, Alterman RL, Tagliati M, STN-DBS frequency effects on freezing of gait in advanced Parkinson disease, Neurology, 2009;72:770; author reply 770–1.
  121. Brudzynski SM, Houghton PE, Brownlee RD, Mogenson GJ, Involvement of neuronal cell bodies of the mesencephalic locomotor region in the initiation of locomotor activity of freely behaving rats, Brain Res Bull, 1986;16:377–81.
  122. Milner KL, Mogenson GJ, Electrical and chemical activation of the mesencephalic and subthalamic locomotor regions in freely moving rats, Brain Res, 1988;452:273–85.
  123. Plaha P, Gill SS, Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine nucleus for Parkinson’s disease, Neuroreport, 2005;16:1883–7.
  124. Bacskai BJ, Frosch MP, Freeman SH, et al., Molecular imaging with Pittsburgh Compound B confirmed at autopsy: a case report, Arch Neurol, 2007;64:431–4.
  125. Ferraye MU, Debu B, Fraix V, et al., Effects of pedunculopontine nucleus area stimulation on gait disorders in Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 2010;133:205–14.
  126. Moro E, Hamani C, Poon YY, et al., Unilateral pedunculopontine stimulation improves falls in Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 2010;133:215–24.
  127. Ostrem JL, Christine CW, Glass GA, et al., Pedunculopontine nucleus deep brain stimulation in a patient with primary progressive freezing gait disorder, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2010;88:51–5.
  128. Zrinzo L, Zrinzo LV, Surgical anatomy of the pedunculopontine and peripeduncular nuclei, Br J Neurosurg, 2008;22(Suppl. 1):S19–24.
  129. Khan S, Mooney L, Plaha P, et al., Outcomes from stimulation of the caudal zona incerta and pedunculopontine nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Br J Neurosurg, 2011;25:273–80.
  130. Morris ME, Martin CL, Schenkman ML, Striding out with Parkinson disease: evidence-based physical therapy for gait disorders, Phys Ther, 2010;90:280–8.
  131. Kwakkel G, de Goede CJ, van Wegen EE, Impact of physical therapy for Parkinson’s disease: a critical review of the literature, Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 2007;13(Suppl. 3):S478–87.
  132. Goodwin VA, Richards SH, Taylor RS, et al., The effectiveness of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Mov Disord, 2008;23:631–40.
  133. Dibble LE, Addison O, Papa E, The effects of exercise on balance in persons with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review across the disability spectrum, J Neurol Phys Ther, 2009;33:14–26.
  134. Allen NE, Sherrington C, Paul SS, Canning CG, Balance and falls in Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise and motor training, Mov Disord, 2011;26:1605–15.
  135. Cakit BD, Saracoglu M, Genc H, et al., The effects of incremental speed-dependent treadmill training on postural instability and fear of falling in Parkinson’s disease, Clin Rehabil, 2007;21:698–705.
  136. Mehrholz J, Friis R, Kugler J, et al., Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson’s disease, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010;(1):CD007830.
  137. Hackney ME, Earhart GM, Tai Chi improves balance and mobility in people with Parkinson disease, Gait Posture, 2008;28:456–60.
  138. Ridgel AL, Kim CH, Fickes EJ, et al., Changes in executive function after acute bouts of passive cycling in Parkinson’s disease, J Aging Phys Act, 2011;19:87–98.

Further Resources

Share this Article
Related Content In Parkinson's Disease
  • Copied to clipboard!
    accredited arrow-downarrow_leftarrow-right-bluearrow-right-dark-bluearrow-right-greyarrow-right-orangearrow-right-whitearrow-right-bluearrow-up-orangeavatarcalendarchevron-down consultant-pathologist-nurseconsultant-pathologistcrosscrossdownloademailexclaimationfeedbackfiltergraph-arrowinterviewslinkmdt_iconmenumore_dots nurse-consultantpadlock patient-advocate-pathologistpatient-consultantpatientperson pharmacist-nurseplay_buttonplay-colour-tmcplay-colourAsset 1podcastprinter scenerysearch share single-doctor social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtubeshape-star (1)tick-bluetick-orangetick-whiteticktimetranscriptup-arrowwebinar Department Location NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-07NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-08NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-09NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-10NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-11NEW TMM Corporate Services Icons-12Salary £ TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-01TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-02TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-03TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-04TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-05TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-06TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-07TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-08TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-09TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-10TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-11TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-12TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-13TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-14TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-15TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-16TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-17TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-18TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-19TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-20TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-21TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-22TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-23TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-24TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-25TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-26TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-27TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-28TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-29TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-30TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-31TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-32TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-33TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-34TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-35TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-36TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-37TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-38TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-39TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-40TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-41TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-42TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-43TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-44TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-45TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-46TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-47TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-48TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-49TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-50TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-51TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-52TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-53TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-54TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-55TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-56TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-57TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-58TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-59TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-60TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-61TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-62TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-63TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-64TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-65TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-66TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-67TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-68TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-69TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-70TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-71TMM-Corp-Site-Icons-72